Official WHT Server Benchmark (with UnixBench 5.1.2)

Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > Official WHT Server Benchmark (with UnixBench 5.1.2)

Posted by FHDave, 02-05-2010, 11:58 PM
Please do not post your results if you use old Unixbench 4.x version. This thread is only for UnixBench 5.1.2, the latest UnixBench version, one that is SMP aware. The old server benchmark thread in WHT is filled with non-sense results, most, if not all 136 pages of them. Part of the reason is, I believe, the version 4 of UnixBench is not meant to be used on the multiple CPUs/cores environment, pretty much standard on today's servers. The old Unixbench 4.1-WHT variants produce poor results, especially on Xen environment. Please do not post any further on that old thread. Do not contribute to further confusion caused by that. IMHO, most, if not all, results on that thread should be discarded. This thread is meant to be the replacement. Please only post your test using UnixBench 5.1.2. I am posting the original un-modified version. Let's keep this original version in tact. Simply execute the following command: tar -zxvf unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz cd unixbench-5.1.2 make ./Run or, if you want to disable file-copy tests, execute the following command (instead of ./Run): ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 Please also note that this 5.1.2 version will make two runs. One run will test only 1 core (1 parallel copy). Another run will test all the available cores (e.g., 16 parallel copies for 8 CPUs with HT). I am going to post the first "official" result. Server: Dell PowerEdge R510, Dual E5520 (HyperThreading/Logical CPU DISABLED), 32 GB ECC DDR3 REG, Same server, with HyperThreading/Logical CPUs ENABLED ~38.4% improvement with HT. Post yours. Again, please disable disk I/O test. Use the command above. PS: Thanks to John (JTY) for pointing me towards testing using the 5.1.2 version! Last edited by Quartz; 07-05-2010 at 02:34 AM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 12:14 AM
Disclaimer: if you test your Disk, I bet you will receive a lower result. Again, the Disk I/O should be tested independently. Last edited by sirius; 02-06-2010 at 07:56 PM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 01:17 AM
An almost identical server (Dell PowerEdge R710, Dual E5520, 72 GB ECC DDR REG) running Citrix XenServer 5.5 Platinum. Testing unix bench in 1 VM, with 8 cores, and 1 GB memory. HT/Logical CPUs dissabled. Only 1 VM running. As you can see, the Citrix XenServer VM introduces a penalty, about a factor of 3! I have tested this running multiple VMs together. The result is interesting. One thing I can say is that the Citrix XenServer gives better scaling result than the opensource Xen. 2 VMs running, each with 8 CPUs, 1 GB memory. HT/Logical CPUs still disabled: Total score: ~2500, better than 1 VM running. Last edited by FHDave; 02-06-2010 at 01:22 AM.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 01:55 AM
Dedicated Server - Intel Atom 330 - 2 GB RAM - Interserver - $49/mo
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 02:14 AM
Dell PowerEdge 2950, Dual E5345 (8x2.33 GHz), 32 GB memory no Disk I/O test: Compares this to the E5520! Intel Nehalem is great ...
Posted by yajur, 02-06-2010, 02:40 AM
dual xeon 5430 with 16GB ram and 6*1.5TB HDD in RAID10 System Benchmarks Index Score 2927.5
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 02:44 AM
What RAID controller? How much cache?
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 02:47 AM
ServerComplete OpenVZ VPS - Chicago (cpu capped at 250 Mhz per core x 4 cores)
Posted by dmtinc, 02-06-2010, 02:50 AM
Core2Quad 9400 @ 2.66 ghz | 8 gb ram ddr2 | 1 tb hd
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 02:57 AM
Checking the 1 parallel copy test, it seems to me your 1 TB hard drive is comparable to the 4x500 GB RAID10 with Hardware RAID controller, PERC 6/i, 256 MB, and BBU (Write back) I start to wonder whether this Disk I/O test actually are benchmarking the cache, rather than the drives itself? Last edited by FHDave; 02-06-2010 at 03:01 AM.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 03:02 AM
AMD Phenom II X2 550 Blk 3.1 Ghz - 4 GB RAM - 56K RPM Software RAID 1 Last edited by ramnet; 02-06-2010 at 03:14 AM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 03:15 AM
The same Dell PowerEdge 2950 2xE5345 (8x2.33 GHz), but now with Disk I/O test. 6x750 GB SATA in RAID50. PERC 5/i, 256 MB cache, BBU (write back) Again, checking the disk I/O test on the 1 parallel copy run with other results, I still wonder if the disk I/O is simply testing the disk/controller cache.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 03:27 AM
VPS - Germany - Welcome2Inter.net - 128MB RAM
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 04:01 AM
VPS - The NY NOC - 512MB RAM
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 04:02 AM
Whatever that brings you the most joy, ramnet And if it pleases you, you can request the mod to have the word "official" removed too. I am fine with it Citrix XenServer Platinum VM based on 1xE5520 core (physical, no HT) with 1 GB memory, and EqualLogic iSCSI SAN (RAID10) Seems like one core of E5520 is comparable to the cheap Atom server with 4 cores (HT?). Last edited by FHDave; 02-06-2010 at 04:06 AM.
Posted by htbsales, 02-06-2010, 04:05 AM
Enotch Uranus VPS - 1GB Dedicated Ram:
Posted by msmgaza, 02-06-2010, 04:25 AM
Core2Quad Q9400 8GB RAM
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 04:29 AM
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 - 6 GB RAM Last edited by ramnet; 02-06-2010 at 04:32 AM.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 04:58 AM
Intel Core2Quad Q8200 - 8GB RAM
Posted by david3, 02-06-2010, 06:00 AM
CoreNetworks Starter LE26 Intel 2.6 GHz Celeron (single core) 512 MB RAM
Posted by david3, 02-06-2010, 06:07 AM
CoreNetworks Starter LE16 Intel Celeron Dual Core 1.6 GHz E1200 512 MB RAM
Posted by WireNine, 02-06-2010, 06:53 AM
Xeon 3460, 8GB Memory, 4x300GB SAS 15k RAID-10.
Posted by Matt R, 02-06-2010, 12:22 PM
I got curious and tested our new VPS node
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 12:35 PM
what drives do you have? RAID? BTW, to make your result posted with better format, change the font to Courier New.
Posted by jeffreywu, 02-06-2010, 12:35 PM
Serverloft Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2344 HE 4GB DDR2 667 7200rpm 250GB*2 Hardware Raid1 Last edited by jeffreywu; 02-06-2010 at 12:39 PM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 12:39 PM
Actually, I just caught your CPU specs, ClubUptime. You have 4-way Opteron 8350, each with 4 cores (total 16 cores)? It's a nice setup. I wonder why your score is low though. This would be 16 physical cores. But your overall score (16 parallel copy) is quite low. Can you do the benchmark skipping the disk part? Want to compare the nice CPUs you have with other CPUs.
Posted by Nich, 02-06-2010, 03:23 PM
Intel Q9550 8GB RAM 2x1TB HW RAID 1
Posted by cheaptraffic, 02-06-2010, 03:29 PM
i7 860 4GB RAM, 1TB HDD CentOS 5.4 64 bit
Posted by e-Sensibility, 02-06-2010, 04:04 PM
We've done extensive application level benchmarks and also unixbench and similar "general" benchmarks and what we've found is that unixbench is not even close to representative of the actual performance of virtual systems. Unixbench, I've found, will often generate a LOWER score on superior hardware. Well, you might say, maybe the hardware is in fact not as superior as you thought -- sure, except that on application benchmarks the superior hardware (which scored low on unixbench) will completely trash the inferior hardware (that often scores higher in unixbench) composed of older components. So, as much as the WHT community may like these benchmark threads, I'm not sure that they actually mean much. Last edited by e-Sensibility; 02-06-2010 at 04:08 PM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 04:17 PM
P4/3.0 GHz (HyperThreading) with a single SATA drive at PacificRack Note: Interesting. Unlike the HT in E5520 CPUs, the HT in P4 actually reduces performance. I guess this has been reported before as well.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 04:18 PM
Agreed - on virtual solutions it will often show burstable performance rather than typical sustained performance. The old 4.x unix bench, yes, it often did. Thus why we have a new version. Run this benchmark and the old 4.1 benchmark in the old thread on the same hardware and this one scores higher every time. Sometimes significantly higher - as on my new desktop rig (a Phenom X2 550): UnixBench 5.2 = single thread:541 smp:776 UnixBench 4.1 = score:179 Like all benchmarks they should be taken with a grain of salt - but this newer unix bench should be a fair bit more realistic than that old one was.
Posted by Matt R, 02-06-2010, 04:21 PM
Give me the full syntax for which tests you want to see run and I'll give it a go and post up the results. Edit: Yes, Raid 10 is in use.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 04:35 PM
Here is a subset command you can use: So, just to confirm, you have 4 way 4 cores CPUs for a total of 16 physical cores? It's a nice setup you have. The result is just a bit confusing ... Hope the subset test above will reveal something more informative.
Posted by Matt R, 02-06-2010, 04:39 PM
Yup, that is correct. AMD Opteron 8350, quad core, quad CPU. I'm running the benchmark now. Let's see what comes out of it -- I didn't look at other results, but 8-core intel machines getting twice the results seems a bit off.
Posted by sirius, 02-06-2010, 04:44 PM
CentOS VM (Single Processor, 1g of ram) under VMWare ESXi.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 04:59 PM
It should be obvious: Single-Threaded Test: Comparing the single-threaded hard disk test to the results from here: There is clearly something wrong with your hard disk setup. In fact: I'm getting better results than you on a single WDC WD5000KS-00M drive. Either your RAID controller is crap or your hard drives/bios settings aren't correct - or your drives have almost no prefeching/read-ahead/controller caching capabilities. ===== Asking him to run the test again it a bit silly imo - all the results are presented line by line as it is anyway Last edited by ramnet; 02-06-2010 at 05:10 PM.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 05:08 PM
There is no such thing as 56K or 72K drives BTW, you copy and paste a wrong thing. In any case, the 8 parallel test will do 8 simultaneous file copy. Your file copy result should be lower on the 8 parallel test, or else, I think you are clearly just benchmarking your disk cache. Again, benchmarking hard drive is a lot more difficult than benchmarking your other system. People simply don't realize this (and again, there are many better tools to do HD benchmark). In any case, I think ClubUptime has othe more important issues. The Execl and process creation tests, for example, do not scale (or only slightly vary) with the number of CPUs.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 05:11 PM
My post has been corrected now Thus why I focus on the result from the single-threaded file copy test Agreed.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 05:23 PM
Which Unixbench? The Unixbench 4, and the WHT variant, is flawed because it cannot test SMP environment. Besides, it really does give low score especially for Xen virtualization. Many Xen hosts had been "bashed" because of this. Unixbench 5.1.2 is ton better than Unixbench 4. At least it is SMP aware. It may not. In fact, I don't think the file copy test on Unixbench is accurate at all (as you said, there might be other better tools to use, and there are certainly for the disk/file benchmark). But, since many hosts (us including) are evaluated based on these tests, I think at the very least it is necessary to turn the wheel around away from the unixbench 4 tests, which is clearly wrong.
Posted by Matt R, 02-06-2010, 05:29 PM

Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 05:33 PM
Well, what an irony. You are against me ignoring the file copy, yet you want to ignore the file copy test on the multiple parallel tests? How are you going to be able to compare the result between single and multiple parallel tests? Besides, you really want to test the servers in production right? The server does not just perform a single threaded file copy operation. If you have a node with N VMs, then most likely the multiple parallel test is correct. If you get a close result on your file copy between single and multiple parallel tests, then it could be that you are simply testing your HD cache. Thus, as I mentioned from the beginning (after doing these tests 100+ times on our various setup), I sincerely think that the disk I/O tests may cause further confusion. Again, there are many better and more comprehensive HD benchmark utilities to use out there.
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 05:40 PM
Yes, it is. However, the problem is the NUMBER of parallel tests - it is tied to the number of cpu cores - a worthless metric for comparing file copy tests imo. The only reliable and fair way to compare disparate systems is to either rely on the single threaded file copy test or compare systems running the same number of parallel file copy tests. Like you said, 16 in parallel will be slower than 2/4/8 - so why do you want to compare it?
Posted by badboyx, 02-06-2010, 06:22 PM
when you are going to release vps's on that BIG MONSTER Server ?
Posted by e-Sensibility, 02-06-2010, 06:45 PM
I find unixbench 5.2 to be just as flawed. We tested an HVM VPS and a paravirt VPS of equivalent specs -- the HVM VPS scored around 5x as high as the paravirt VPS according to unixbench 5.2. We then did mysql benchmarks and IO tests and the paravirt VPS slaughtered the HVM VPS. Unixbench is just not good at measuring the performance of virtualized environments, IMO -- at least not Xen environments.
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 06:55 PM
already did From what I can see, Citrix XenServer VM with 1 vCPU E5520 core equipped with iSCSI SAN performs just as well compared to the dual core Atom server (with HT, so 4 logical CPUs).
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 06:57 PM
Still very low result. My 2xE5520 node gives a score of 5200+ (no disk benchmark) and 7200+ with HT. Are you testing inside the VPS/VM or on the node itself?
Posted by ramnet, 02-06-2010, 07:35 PM
Here's a classic Packard Bell Supreme 1665 - Bios Date: 1994 Intel Pentium 166 Mhz - 64 MB RAM - IDE-ATA-33 5 GB Maxtor 7.2K Drive
Posted by sirius, 02-06-2010, 08:03 PM
Thread cleaned up a bit. If you disagree with someone, state your case. If you attack another poster, you're not going to like the consequences. Discuss the issue. Not the person. Sirius
Posted by CMead, 02-06-2010, 10:13 PM
anyone have any ideas why i am getting errors when running make and why Run fails? I have run version 4.1 just fine. it is a 64bit CentOS 5 server...
Posted by FHDave, 02-06-2010, 10:14 PM
what is your error?
Posted by CMead, 02-06-2010, 10:18 PM
./src/ubgears.c:590: error: âuse_threadsafe_apiâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:605: warning: implicit declaration of function âXInitThreadsâ ./src/ubgears.c:612: warning: implicit declaration of function âXOpenDisplayâ ./src/ubgears.c:618: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDefaultScreenOfDisplayâ ./src/ubgears.c:620: error: âwinrectâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:628: warning: implicit declaration of function âmake_windowâ ./src/ubgears.c:628: error: âwinâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:628: error: âctxâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: implicit declaration of function âglGetStringâ ./src/ubgears.c:632: error: âGL_RENDERERâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:633: error: âGL_VERSIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:633: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:634: error: âGL_VENDORâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:634: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:635: error: âGL_EXTENSIONSâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:635: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:641: warning: implicit declaration of function âevent_loopâ ./src/ubgears.c:643: warning: implicit declaration of function âglXDestroyContextâ ./src/ubgears.c:645: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDestroyWindowâ ./src/ubgears.c:646: warning: implicit declaration of function âXCloseDisplayâ make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# make^M./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:632:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:633: error: âGL_VERSIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:633: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size -bash: ./src/ubgears.c:633:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:634: error: âGL_VENDORâ undeclared (first use in this function) -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:634: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size -bash: ./src/ubgears.c:634:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:635: error: âGL_EXTENSIONSâ undeclared (first use in this function) -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:635: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size -bash: ./src/ubgears.c:635:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:641: warning: implicit declaration of function âevent_loop -bash: ./src/ubgears.c:641:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# â./src/ubgears.c:643: warning: implicit declaration of function âglXDestroyContext -bash: â./src/ubgears.c:643:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# â./src/ubgears.c:645: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDestroyWindow -bash: â./src/ubgears.c:645:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# â./src/ubgears.c:646: warning: implicit declaration of function âXCloseDisplay -bash: â./src/ubgears.c:646:: No such file or directory [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# âmake: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 -bash: âmake:: command not found [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# ./src/ubgears.c:635: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size warni [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]# make Checking distribution of files ./pgms exists ./src exists ./testdir exists ./tmp exists ./results exists gcc -o ./pgms/ubgears -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall ./src/ubgears.c -lGL -lXext -lX11 ./src/ubgears.c:48:22: error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory ./src/ubgears.c:49:23: error: X11/Xutil.h: No such file or directory ./src/ubgears.c:50:24: error: X11/keysym.h: No such file or directory ./src/ubgears.c:51:19: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory ./src/ubgears.c:52:20: error: GL/glx.h: No such file or directory ./src/ubgears.c:75: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âverboseâ ./src/ubgears.c:129: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âview_rotxâ ./src/ubgears.c:130: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âgear1â ./src/ubgears.c:131: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âangleâ ./src/ubgears.c:132: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âspeedâ ./src/ubgears.c:133: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âprintInfoâ ./src/ubgears.c:147: error: expected â)â before âinner_radiusâ ./src/ubgears.c: In function âdrawâ: ./src/ubgears.c:283: warning: implicit declaration of function âglClearâ ./src/ubgears.c:283: error: âGL_COLOR_BUFFER_BITâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:283: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./src/ubgears.c:283: error: for each function it appears in.) ./src/ubgears.c:283: error: âGL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BITâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:285: warning: implicit declaration of function âglPushMatrixâ ./src/ubgears.c:286: warning: implicit declaration of function âglRotatefâ ./src/ubgears.c:286: error: âview_rotxâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:287: error: âview_rotyâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:288: error: âview_rotzâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:291: warning: implicit declaration of function âglTranslatefâ ./src/ubgears.c:292: error: âangleâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:293: warning: implicit declaration of function âglCallListâ ./src/ubgears.c:293: error: âgear1â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:294: warning: implicit declaration of function âglPopMatrixâ ./src/ubgears.c:299: error: âgear2â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:305: error: âgear3â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c: In function âreshapeâ: ./src/ubgears.c:316: error: âGLfloatâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:316: error: expected â;â before âhâ ./src/ubgears.c:318: warning: implicit declaration of function âglViewportâ ./src/ubgears.c:318: error: âGLintâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:318: error: expected â)â before âwidthâ ./src/ubgears.c:319: warning: implicit declaration of function âglMatrixModeâ ./src/ubgears.c:319: error: âGL_PROJECTIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:320: warning: implicit declaration of function âglLoadIdentityâ ./src/ubgears.c:322: error: âhâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:323: warning: implicit declaration of function âglFrustumâ ./src/ubgears.c:326: error: âGL_MODELVIEWâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c: In function âinitâ: ./src/ubgears.c:335: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions ./src/ubgears.c:335: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âposâ ./src/ubgears.c:335: error: âposâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:335: error: expected expression before â{â token ./src/ubgears.c:336: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions ./src/ubgears.c:336: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âredâ ./src/ubgears.c:336: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code ./src/ubgears.c:336: error: âredâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:336: error: expected expression before â{â token ./src/ubgears.c:337: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions ./src/ubgears.c:337: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âgreenâ ./src/ubgears.c:337: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code ./src/ubgears.c:337: error: âgreenâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:337: error: expected expression before â{â token ./src/ubgears.c:338: warning: ISO C forbids nested functions ./src/ubgears.c:338: error: expected â=â, â,â, â;â, âasmâ or â__attribute__â before âblueâ ./src/ubgears.c:338: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code ./src/ubgears.c:338: error: âblueâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:338: error: expected expression before â{â token ./src/ubgears.c:340: warning: implicit declaration of function âglLightfvâ ./src/ubgears.c:340: error: âGL_LIGHT0â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:340: error: âGL_POSITIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:341: warning: implicit declaration of function âglEnableâ ./src/ubgears.c:341: error: âGL_CULL_FACEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:342: error: âGL_LIGHTINGâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:344: error: âGL_DEPTH_TESTâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:347: error: âgear1â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:347: warning: implicit declaration of function âglGenListsâ ./src/ubgears.c:348: warning: implicit declaration of function âglNewListâ ./src/ubgears.c:348: error: âGL_COMPILEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function âglMaterialfvâ ./src/ubgears.c:349: error: âGL_FRONTâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:349: error: âGL_AMBIENT_AND_DIFFUSEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:350: warning: implicit declaration of function âgearâ ./src/ubgears.c:351: warning: implicit declaration of function âglEndListâ ./src/ubgears.c:353: error: âgear2â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:359: error: âgear3â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:365: error: âGL_NORMALIZEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c: At top level: ./src/ubgears.c:374: error: expected â)â before â*â token ./src/ubgears.c:455: error: expected â)â before â*â token ./src/ubgears.c: In function âmainâ: ./src/ubgears.c:556: error: âBoolâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:556: error: expected â;â before âuse_threadsafe_apiâ ./src/ubgears.c:557: error: âDisplayâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:557: error: âdpyâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:558: error: âWindowâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:558: error: expected â;â before âwinâ ./src/ubgears.c:559: error: âScreenâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:559: error: âscreenâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:560: error: âGLXContextâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:560: error: expected â;â before âctxâ ./src/ubgears.c:561: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code ./src/ubgears.c:563: error: âXRectangleâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:563: error: expected â;â before âwinrectâ ./src/ubgears.c:577: error: âprintInfoâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:577: error: âGL_TRUEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:585: error: âverboseâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:585: error: âTrueâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:590: error: âuse_threadsafe_apiâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:605: warning: implicit declaration of function âXInitThreadsâ ./src/ubgears.c:612: warning: implicit declaration of function âXOpenDisplayâ ./src/ubgears.c:618: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDefaultScreenOfDisplayâ ./src/ubgears.c:620: error: âwinrectâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:628: warning: implicit declaration of function âmake_windowâ ./src/ubgears.c:628: error: âwinâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:628: error: âctxâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: implicit declaration of function âglGetStringâ ./src/ubgears.c:632: error: âGL_RENDERERâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:633: error: âGL_VERSIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:633: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:634: error: âGL_VENDORâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:634: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:635: error: âGL_EXTENSIONSâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:635: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:641: warning: implicit declaration of function âevent_loopâ ./src/ubgears.c:643: warning: implicit declaration of function âglXDestroyContextâ ./src/ubgears.c:645: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDestroyWindowâ ./src/ubgears.c:646: warning: implicit declaration of function âXCloseDisplayâ make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 [root@bench unixbench-5.1.2]#
Posted by Hosting Spot, 02-06-2010, 10:27 PM
Very nice man!
Posted by devonblzx, 02-07-2010, 03:06 AM
Had to track down a few packages that were required to compile this on my plain CentOS 5 server... For others: yum install mesa-libGL-devel libXext-devel ..should do the trick RockMyWeb / VirtuallyDedicated 1GB VPS (OpenVZ Cloud Server / Quad-Core)
Posted by Orien, 02-07-2010, 04:09 AM
6sync 512MB Xen VPS
Posted by david3, 02-07-2010, 05:29 AM
CoreNetworks Starter LE26 Intel 2.6 GHz Celeron (single core) 512 MB RAM With disk tests excluded. With disk tests excluded, the score is a little lower (392.2 vs. 421.0 including them). Here's the results for the same server with disk tests included: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...8&postcount=20
Posted by david3, 02-07-2010, 05:34 AM
CoreNetworks Starter LE16 Intel Celeron Dual Core 1.6 GHz E1200 512 MB RAM With disk tests excluded. With disk tests included the score was 959.7; excluded the score was a little better: 1089.5 Here's the results for the same server with disk tests included: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...0&postcount=21
Posted by Microlinux, 02-07-2010, 07:48 AM
2 x E5420, X7DCL-i, 12G RAM, 2 x WD RE3 RAID 1:
Posted by lomii, 02-07-2010, 01:18 PM
hello, my old dedicated server : AMD opteron 150 2.4GHz - 1Go FBDIMM DDR2 - 2x 80 Go SATA RAID 1 ----------------------------------------------------------
Posted by DigitalLinx, 02-07-2010, 05:22 PM
Core2quad q9550 @ 2.83GHZ OpenVZ VM 384MB RAM 2 x SAMSUNG HE753LJ in RAID1
Posted by elvis1, 02-07-2010, 08:00 PM
hi, I get this do this also work in vps environments?
Posted by MakoS, 02-07-2010, 08:42 PM
You need "libXext-devel" installed on your server. Install it using "yum install libXext-devel" and that should get you up and running.
Posted by cyb, 02-08-2010, 03:23 AM
Dual Intel Xeon E55040 12 GB RAM 2 x 1TB Hard Drive with RAID 1
Posted by Cyclon, 02-08-2010, 06:45 AM
Clustered.net VPS / 2 GB RAM
Posted by dmtinc, 02-08-2010, 11:57 AM
PhotonVps Xen WARP 1
Posted by elvis1, 02-08-2010, 02:34 PM
thanks but this is one of the things I hate from centos.. to have a lib running you need countless repos enabled
Posted by Manacit, 02-08-2010, 02:53 PM
The New York NOC Super VPS with WHT special upgrades that they were offering a few months back (2GB of RAM, 70GB HD space). Not Bad! Last edited by Manacit; 02-08-2010 at 02:56 PM.
Posted by HSVI-V, 02-08-2010, 09:08 PM
Intel Core i7 920 8GB RAM 2 X 1TB RAID 1
Posted by houkouonchi, 02-10-2010, 12:24 AM
Unfortunately this new version takes forever to run so I ended up doing other stuff on my computer while it ran. Just yesterday I took out one of my CPU's and half my ram due to some hardware issues with my server as I didn't want to order a new cpu ram ATM. Machine: NORCO RPC-4020 Case Supermicro MBD-X8DTH-iF-O Single Intel Xeon E5530 CPU (2.4 Ghz) MSI Geforce gtx 260 24GB DDR3 PC-1333 ECC Memory ARC-1280ML raid controller 20x1TB Seagate SATA (raid6)
Posted by DoYouSpeakWak??, 02-10-2010, 09:05 PM
First vps i tested Surftown.dk App vps. 256mb ram. Plesk Second vps to test was Delimiter.us. German server. VPS 100. 4gb ram. Pretty nice considering the first vps cost double what the last one does and has less features.
Posted by Mat Sumpter, 02-11-2010, 03:12 PM
1 x Intel Xeon X3460 w/HT 8GB DDR3 RAM CentOS5
Posted by FHDave, 02-11-2010, 03:22 PM
X3460 is a four core CPU. So this is with HT, isn't it? /never mind, you already mentioned it. What is the result without HT?
Posted by BTCentral - Ben, 02-12-2010, 08:16 PM
My current Xen testing box at e-Sensibility. Package: [es0] 30 GB SAN-based Storage, 768 MB Dedicated RAM. Just used ./Run - compiled without the Graphics tests.
Posted by WireNine, 02-13-2010, 05:09 PM
Can anyone post results from a Dual E5520, 4x1TB SATA II RAID-10, 12GB Memory?
Posted by BTCentral - Ben, 02-14-2010, 10:39 AM
Wow... nice result for a VPS. One of our production VPS with delimiter.us Package: VPS50, Germany - 50GB HDD, 768MB RAM (2GB Burst) Just used ./Run - compiled without the Graphics tests. Currently testing our VPS100 in San Jose too. Will post the results when done. Last edited by BTCentral - Ben; 02-14-2010 at 10:44 AM.
Posted by BTCentral - Ben, 02-14-2010, 11:24 AM
This time four cores of a Core2 Quad Q9400 rather than a single core of a Core i7 920. Another one of our production VPS from delimiter.us Package: VPS100, San Jose - 100GB HDD, 1.5GB RAM (4GB Burst) Again, just used ./Run - compiled without the Graphics tests. Unsurprisingly, the four cores of a i7 920 perform better than this as shown by DoYouSpeakWak??'s German VPS100 benchmark here - however we needed a VPS in the US, and unfortunately delimiter do not offer Core i7 VPS there. All VPS I tested have been running CentOS 5.4 x86_64. Last edited by BTCentral - Ben; 02-14-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Posted by houkouonchi, 02-15-2010, 05:29 AM
DreamHost PS VPS:
Posted by bentink, 02-15-2010, 04:54 PM
I am not sure what I am doing wrong here
Posted by zomgmike, 02-15-2010, 10:23 PM
yum install libXext-devel then try
Posted by bentink, 02-16-2010, 10:00 AM
Test done on a sample WebT LVE-07 OpenVZ VPS with 6 GB RAM Last edited by bentink; 02-16-2010 at 10:03 AM.
Posted by Samuraid, 02-16-2010, 10:34 PM
LiquidWeb Storm 4GB VPS (note: includes both CPU and disk benchmarks) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz Last edited by Samuraid; 02-16-2010 at 10:41 PM.
Posted by Samuraid, 02-16-2010, 10:35 PM
LiquidWeb Storm 8GB VPS (note: includes both CPU and disk benchmarks) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz Last edited by Samuraid; 02-16-2010 at 10:41 PM.
Posted by Samuraid, 02-16-2010, 10:36 PM
LiquidWeb Storm 16GB VPS (note: includes both CPU and disk benchmarks) CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2378 Last edited by Samuraid; 02-16-2010 at 10:42 PM.
Posted by Samuraid, 02-16-2010, 10:37 PM
LiquidWeb Storm 32GB VPS (note: includes both CPU and disk benchmarks) CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2378 Last edited by Samuraid; 02-16-2010 at 10:42 PM.
Posted by Same11, 02-17-2010, 08:05 AM
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ 4 GB RAM
Posted by BTCentral - Ben, 02-18-2010, 07:40 AM
A Core i7 920 Dedicated Server, 8 GB DDR3 RAM, 2x1TB ST31000528AS HDD (Barracuda 7200.12 SATA 3Gb/s, 32MB Cache) - RAID1 Just used ./Run - compiled without the Graphics tests.
Posted by FiveNines, 02-19-2010, 07:08 AM
This 5.1 version seems to have the same weird behaviour on Xen for me as 4.1-WHT - as available RAM increases, score goes down. With 1024MB ram ./Run - 273.1 single / 575.4 four cores Shutdown the guest, set memory to 256MB and ./Run again - 528.2 single / 1347.6 four cores I've tried this a couple of times and its very consistant: the score with 256MB is always significantly higher. Is this benchmark garbage, irrelevant on Xen, or could this somehow be confined to our setup? Last edited by FiveNines; 02-19-2010 at 07:13 AM. Reason: Add text output
Posted by Benjyy, 02-19-2010, 12:36 PM
Yisp.nl 128mb Xen VPS XenVZ 128mb Xen VPS
Posted by FHDave, 02-19-2010, 01:57 PM
What makes you think that memory has anything to do with this tests? You can have 32 or even 72 GB memory and it won't do anything for you. Which part of these tests is relevant to the amount of memory you have?
Posted by FiveNines, 02-19-2010, 05:09 PM
I login to the Xen host over ssh, shut down the guest and change memory = 1024 to memory = 256 Start the guest back up, and the scores immediately are markedly better as I quoted. The only variable here is memory - its the same guest, with all the same settings, with the same virtual disk, on the same host. There literally is no other variation here; so either Xen guests gets slower with more RAM, or this benchmark does.
Posted by FHDave, 02-19-2010, 05:52 PM
Perhaps your node is simply busier the second time? How many times have you repeated this test to see how repoducible it is? BTW, don't be blind folded by the final score. As you can see in your score results, the only difference between the two tests (one with 1024 MB and 256 MB) is the file copy tests; your file copy is much faster on the second test than the first. The rest of the scores are pretty much identical between the two tests. As I mentioned already in the beginning of this thread, the file copy tests can indeed cause further confusion. Try to do the tests excluding the file copy and you should get identical result, within statistical uncertainties of your tests.
Posted by FiveNines, 02-19-2010, 05:55 PM
I've tried it multiple times, the host is owned by my company and has no other users currently. You're spot on re: the file copy though, I haven't noticed that. I will try a few more runs with that disabled.
Posted by RavC, 02-21-2010, 07:55 PM
Dual Xeon E5520, sans disk tests
Posted by uberownage, 02-24-2010, 01:27 PM
Hi guys, first time posting on this forum. My scores are low compared to similar specs in previous replies, is it hdd related ? Dell r410 / 8gb ram / 250GB X 2 RAID SAS
Posted by RavC, 02-24-2010, 07:18 PM
Try this command to ignore the HDD tests: FHDave initially posted that the HDD tests did not scale/reflect real-world performance. The first post has since been edited however, so not sure on current status, but at least it will make it easier to compare.
Posted by Nex7, 02-25-2010, 01:18 PM
I'm happy to see a new benchmark thread start up with a newer benchmark tool; but is it wise to get going again, with what is essentially just a slightly fixed up version of the old one.. and it itself claiming to have been created in 2007? I haven't looked (and I intend to, now), but is there not a better benchmark suite available, freely, for Linux than UnixBench? Let's face it - even 5.1.2 is odd, flaky, the I/O tests are highly suspect, as are a few of the other tests.. and it doesn't properly report information about the box's specs within its results, which is a problem since many people forget to post them along with the readout (if it was in the read-out, no more problem).
Posted by uberownage, 02-25-2010, 02:08 PM
Thanks for the info. Will post the results once I get to run it again during off peak timings.
Posted by uberownage, 02-25-2010, 11:17 PM
Dell r410 / 8gb ram / 250GB X 2 RAID SAS ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 Wow why are the scores so bad for mine.
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 12:19 AM
Uberownage - what cpu's do you have in there?
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 12:26 AM
Xen Powered VPS of ours. Supermicro Machine with dual E5420 & 24gb ram total. 8 Drive raid 10 array. vcpus=4 memory = "1024" Ran the bench again with "./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16":
Posted by uberownage, 02-26-2010, 12:43 AM
dual e5520.
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 01:26 AM
Hmmm, then why are you running Machine: i686 (i386)?
Posted by ramnet, 02-26-2010, 02:21 AM
Intel DH55TC / Intel Core i3 540 @ 3.07 Ghz, 8GB DDR3-1333, 2x WD7501AALS SW RAID 1, CentOS 5.4
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 02:45 AM
I can't reproduce that on my xen vps: Same specs as my other post, only lowered the ram value and restarted. vcpus=4 memory = "256"
Posted by uberownage, 02-26-2010, 07:15 AM
Heh. I dun get watcha trying to point out. Did my host misconfig something ?
Posted by sharmaine1111, 02-26-2010, 09:54 AM
I am getting an error /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXext collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 Can someone please help me?
Posted by sharmaine1111, 02-26-2010, 11:07 AM
Why is the score for my i7 920 with 12 GB RAM is very low? Ive seen i7 920 as high as 5000+ while mine is only 1710.3
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 11:38 AM
You have 32 bit running on 64 bit hardware. Why? Sometimes running 32 bit makes sense, if it's in a vps or something, but this is a physical server with gobs of ram. I think perhaps your low score is due to this. Perhaps someone here who understands these tests better than I can correct me if I am incorrect.
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 11:51 AM
Your drive scores are low. Try running the test without those benches? Use this command: ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 Altho compared to an i7 post a couple pages back, you execl score is low too: ----- System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 61596289.0 5278.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 20753.0 3773.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 27670.6 6435.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 871339.9 2200.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 214819.4 1298.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2699375.1 4654.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 10366002.4 8332.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2061853.9 5154.6 Process Creation 126.0 61065.3 4846.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 39479.0 9311.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5391.3 8985.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 12941788.5 8627.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 5019.8 ----- Besides, it's just a benchmark. You should really be running your tests 3x or more and averaging the results. There are a lot of factors that could affect your performance and your score should be mostly used as a baseline for tuning your own server/vps.
Posted by lostmind, 02-26-2010, 11:53 AM
yum install libXext-devel is what you are missing.
Posted by emptymind, 02-26-2010, 04:05 PM
This error comes up when you have the graphics tests enabled in the Makefile, if you edit the file "Makefile" and change: # Comment the line out to disable these tests. GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined To: # Comment the line out to disable these tests. #GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined And rerun the make it will not have that error. Since most servers run in text mode, graphic tests are not really relevant.
Posted by mtrc, 02-27-2010, 02:26 AM
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz 12GB of RAM, no RAID #GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined
Posted by mtrc, 02-28-2010, 09:28 AM
The same server with Fedora 12 64bit A huge difference for pipe tests between Fedora and Ubuntu? Really strange, any idea why?
Posted by Sc00by22, 02-28-2010, 06:38 PM
I just ran this off a VPS from UrgentVPS that I'm playing around with.
Posted by barry[CoffeeSprout], 03-08-2010, 09:31 AM
I'm getting a load of these:
Posted by Bono_, 03-08-2010, 10:31 AM
I got same error as user above me, I'm using Debian Lenny 2.6.30.3 kernel.
Posted by ultrabizweb, 03-10-2010, 02:55 PM
I used to run version 4 but today I am running version 5 on new vps I have. I had compiling problems until I commented out the Graphics directive in the Makefile and then ran make and then the Run command. Hope this helps someone.
Posted by kpanel, 03-16-2010, 09:03 PM
Ramhost (512->768MB, 40GB, 500GB Transfer, Burst 5000MHz across 2 cores) Home Server (P3 966MHz, 512MB, 10GB)
Posted by kpanel, 03-16-2010, 10:11 PM
Above post was with 4.1 Test, below is with v5. Ramhost (512->768MB, 40GB, 500GB Transfer, Burst 5000MHz across 2 cores) Home Server (P3 966MHz, 512MB, 10GB)
Posted by houkouonchi, 03-20-2010, 01:03 AM
Atom D510
Posted by Daniel15, 03-20-2010, 01:35 AM
PhotonVPS BEAM1 - 512 MB RAM, 20 GB space, US$9.86 per month
Posted by Daniel15, 03-20-2010, 03:32 AM
HiVelocity, Core 2 Duo, 160GB SATA drive, 2 GB RAM, Debian Linux
Posted by ramnet, 03-21-2010, 01:54 AM
TO EVERYONE WITH ISSUES COMPILING/BUILDING THIS Run this to fix: sed -i "s/GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined/#GRAPHIC_TESTS = defined/g" ./Makefile Then you can ./Run as usual Mabe a mod can add the above command to the first post
Posted by HUGOBLUE, 03-21-2010, 08:39 AM
Or maybe everyone should read the README file first ..
Posted by ramnet, 03-21-2010, 05:33 PM
Yeah well....fat chance of that happening Already had 3 or 4 people complaining and adding clutter to this thread - something had to be said to stop the newbies I made it as easy as possible - no need to even know how vi or nano works
Posted by Daniel15, 03-21-2010, 10:32 PM
There's people with dedicated servers that don't know how a text editor works?
Posted by -Edward-, 03-22-2010, 10:25 AM
Xensmart - 256Mb Ram - £9 per month.
Posted by coume, 03-22-2010, 07:38 PM
WiredTree VPS 768 The script crashed during the second part of the test.
Posted by Vinayak_Sharma, 03-23-2010, 04:31 AM
OpenVZ 4Gb RAM VPS
Posted by HNLV, 03-23-2010, 08:43 AM
RackSpace Cloud Servers, 10GB HDD, 256MB MEM Last edited by HNLV; 03-23-2010 at 08:50 AM.
Posted by HNLV, 03-23-2010, 08:51 AM
HP DL365 Dual Dual-Core AMD 2220, 6 x 36GB SAS RAID6, 2GB MEM
Posted by Neosmith, 03-28-2010, 12:54 AM
256 MB OpenVZ VPS from http://www.servercomplete.com
Posted by sumi, 03-28-2010, 05:04 AM
2 core E5430 Dedicated cores 2GB ram 50 GB HDD Raid5 I was expecting much better score. Because i do not completely understand it why i do not get better score ?!
Posted by resellertr, 03-30-2010, 05:57 PM
AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 720 Processor OverClocked @3.3 Ghz 2 X 2 GB DDRI 800 Mhz Ram 2 X 320 GB SATAII Seagate Cent OS 5.4 64 Bit
Posted by yajur, 04-03-2010, 06:36 AM
dual 5620 3*2TB HDD with 12GB ram is this a low score?
Posted by rezilient, 04-03-2010, 07:29 PM
Hello. I am getting the following error on my Dell PowerEdge 1850, (4GB RAM, 2x150 GB SCSI RAID-1). I was able to run the 4.1 WHT version without issue: Any thoughts what the error might be? Thanks.
Posted by PCS-Chris, 04-05-2010, 07:14 PM
PC Smart Hosting UVZ-512 - 512MB High Bandwidth OpenVZ VPS, Softlayer Dallas
Posted by Kohrar, 04-07-2010, 02:54 PM
SteadCom VPS (768MB Memory, 40GB Disk, 1TB bandwidth, XEN) - $10/mo Running centos 5.2 Last edited by Kohrar; 04-07-2010 at 03:06 PM. Reason: added xen
Posted by Zurbi, 04-07-2010, 03:21 PM
Where for $10? SteadCom start from $19.95 Zurbi
Posted by Kohrar, 04-07-2010, 06:35 PM
They are having a promo with their VPSes.
Posted by hycloud, 04-11-2010, 04:49 PM
Hostgator VPS (0.56 GHz, 384MB RAM)
Posted by hycloud, 04-11-2010, 04:52 PM
Some crazy cloud (600MHz, 376MB)
Posted by rezilient, 04-12-2010, 05:54 PM
Does anyone know what this error is that I am getting with Unix Bench 5.1.2? Run: "Pipe-based Context Switching": slave read failed: No such file or directory; aborting Thanks.
Posted by cstamets, 04-13-2010, 06:18 PM
Interesting. I'm getting the same thing.
Posted by FHDave, 04-13-2010, 07:06 PM
Anybody has benchmark for the new Intel Westmere?
Posted by samiram, 04-15-2010, 02:09 PM
Hi Guys, Getting the below error when making. Its on a fresh debian 5 installation. fast:~/unixbench-5.1.2# make Checking distribution of files ./pgms exists ./src exists ./testdir exists ./tmp exists ./results exists gcc -o ./pgms/arithoh -DTIME -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -ffast-math -Wall -Darithoh ./src/arith.c ./src/arith.c:32:19: error: stdio.h: No such file or directory ./src/arith.c:33:20: error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory In file included from ./src/arith.c:34: ./src/timeit.c:29:20: error: signal.h: No such file or directory ./src/timeit.c:30:20: error: unistd.h: No such file or directory In file included from ./src/arith.c:34: ./src/timeit.c: In function âwake_meâ: ./src/timeit.c:37: warning: implicit declaration of function âsignalâ ./src/timeit.c:37: error: âSIGALRMâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/timeit.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./src/timeit.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.) ./src/timeit.c:39: warning: implicit declaration of function âalarmâ ./src/arith.c: In function âreportâ: ./src/arith.c:43: warning: implicit declaration of function âfprintfâ ./src/arith.c:43: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âfprintfâ ./src/arith.c:43: error: âstderrâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/arith.c:44: warning: implicit declaration of function âexitâ ./src/arith.c:44: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âexitâ ./src/arith.c: In function âmainâ: ./src/arith.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function âprintfâ ./src/arith.c:55: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âprintfâ ./src/arith.c:56: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function âexitâ ./src/arith.c:59: warning: implicit declaration of function âatoiâ make: *** [pgms/arithoh] Error 1 fast:~/unixbench-5.1.2#
Posted by samiram, 04-15-2010, 06:53 PM
Finally fix it by installing these packages. aptitude install libpcre3 libpcre3-dev libpcrecpp0 libssl-dev zlib1g-dev
Posted by samiram, 04-15-2010, 07:46 PM
FDCServers ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: fast: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.26-2-686 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 9 17:35:51 UTC 2010 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz (4670.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz (4666.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization 16:44:29 up 11:35, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 15 2010 16:44:29 - 17:12:22 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12088117.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2089.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4692.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 469698.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 131341.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 984001.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 919392.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 128972.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 13600.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7045.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1508.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1524809.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12088117.6 1035.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2089.4 379.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 4692.6 1091.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 469698.4 1186.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 131341.5 793.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 984001.3 1696.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 919392.4 739.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 128972.6 322.4 Process Creation 126.0 13600.5 1079.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7045.4 1661.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1508.2 2513.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1524809.4 1016.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 976.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Apr 15 2010 17:12:22 - 17:40:17 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24412041.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3967.5 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 9367.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 383140.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 110453.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1035445.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1837401.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 280324.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 27900.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11371.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1626.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2874598.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24412041.3 2091.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3967.5 721.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 9367.0 2178.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 383140.0 967.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 110453.4 667.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1035445.5 1785.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1837401.0 1477.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 280324.9 700.8 Process Creation 126.0 27900.6 2214.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11371.8 2682.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1626.9 2711.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2874598.4 1916.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1491.3 fast:~/unixbench-5.1.2#
Posted by GwebHosting, 04-15-2010, 10:47 PM
Our normal shared hosting server: Intel i7 2x QuadCore / 8GB DDR3 / SATA-II soft-raid1 Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 16 2010 04:44:58 - 05:13:15 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15488960.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3052.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3298.7 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 932150.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 265394.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1773671.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2275218.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 207201.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10423.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5805.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2522.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3782864.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15488960.1 1327.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3052.8 555.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 3298.7 767.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 932150.2 2353.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 265394.8 1603.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1773671.4 3058.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2275218.8 1829.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 207201.0 518.0 Process Creation 126.0 10423.2 827.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5805.0 1369.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2522.1 4203.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3782864.7 2521.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1431.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Apr 16 2010 05:13:15 - 05:41:16 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 59498235.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 19685.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 27466.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 423403.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 104898.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 938810.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 10693257.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2322941.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 80319.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 38595.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5247.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 13180383.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59498235.4 5098.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 19685.5 3579.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 27466.0 6387.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 423403.6 1069.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 104898.9 633.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 938810.9 1618.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 10693257.6 8595.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2322941.3 5807.4 Process Creation 126.0 80319.7 6374.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 38595.0 9102.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5247.2 8745.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 13180383.8 8786.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 4180.1
Posted by rezilient, 04-15-2010, 11:44 PM
anyone have a clue about this one?
Posted by barry[CoffeeSprout], 04-18-2010, 04:09 PM
VPS.NET 6 nodes (2.2 GB, 3 cores)
Posted by barry[CoffeeSprout], 04-18-2010, 05:31 PM
DataBaseByDesign VPS 3 (4 GB ram, 8 VCPU) Dedicated server (Dell, dual quad core Nehalem, 24 GB memory Clustered VPS 8 GB memory, 8 VCPU
Posted by Andrew Moore, 04-21-2010, 06:55 AM
Core i5 Quad Core I5-750
Posted by jcy1978, 04-26-2010, 04:29 PM
Intel Core I7-930, 4 GB RAM, 500GB SATA2-300: <> ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: sa: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 11:30:06 EDT 2010 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5585.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz (5586.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 02:35:19 up 8 min, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.31, 0.21; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 25 2010 02:35:19 - 03:03:53 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16904966.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3336.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3116.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 682138.6 KBps (30.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 199188.7 KBps (30.2 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1281654.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1332230.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 186272.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10970.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5043.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2412.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1078088.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16904966.4 1448.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3336.8 606.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 3116.2 724.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 682138.6 1722.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 199188.7 1203.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1281654.0 2209.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1332230.0 1070.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 186272.3 465.7 Process Creation 126.0 10970.4 870.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5043.6 1189.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2412.4 4020.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1078088.7 718.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1130.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 25 2010 03:03:53 - 03:32:45 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 63775967.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 21494.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 29960.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 251261.2 KBps (30.3 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 69119.9 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 719093.7 KBps (30.4 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 7059014.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2024660.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 92908.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 39342.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5386.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 6076718.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 63775967.7 5465.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21494.8 3908.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 29960.7 6967.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 251261.2 634.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 69119.9 417.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 719093.7 1239.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7059014.1 5674.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2024660.3 5061.7 Process Creation 126.0 92908.1 7373.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 39342.6 9278.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5386.7 8977.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 6076718.4 4051.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3509.8 Last edited by Mike V; 04-27-2010 at 02:04 PM.
Posted by JoieDeMort, 04-27-2010, 06:54 PM
Dual Core Atom, 2GB, 500GB Drive - $49 at Wholesale Internet (http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=944132) My scores are actually better than the atom on the first page of this thread: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showth...53#post6634653
Posted by Andrew Moore, 04-28-2010, 08:49 PM
Core i7-870 Quad Core
Posted by DoYouSpeakWak??, 04-29-2010, 06:00 PM
server4you - vSERVER PREMIUM X4 specs * 75,000 MB Webspace (SCSI) * 4,096 MB RAM * 8,192 MB FlexRAM * 7,000 GB Bandwidth/month * 1 IP Address incl. price 17,15385 euro a month first year, after that 34.3 euro per month. incl vat. 19% less for non-eu users and eu companies. test Pro`s 16 cpus. As far as i know you also get this with the smaller packages.(But as i can see from the test it makes no diffrence) guaranteed 5000mhz cpu power. Cons. Expensive compared to other vps that is as fast as this. Example. This is from delimiter.us, priced at 13,44 a month per year incl vat. The two services both include a control panel for the price. delimiter.us wit direct admin (unl) and server4you with plesk (10 clients). Keep in mind delimiter.us test account has half of the ram. Last edited by DoYouSpeakWak??; 04-29-2010 at 06:05 PM.
Posted by JTY, 04-29-2010, 09:43 PM
Atom 330, 2GB Dual Channel DDR2, Hitachi 1TB HD
Posted by (Stephen), 04-30-2010, 01:27 AM
I have been messing around with linux on Hyper-V Server for some reason today...40GB dynamically expanding file VHD on RAID1 SATA2 at backend. Single core is all that was allocated. 1024MB RAM No optimizations or linux integration tools installed: Last edited by (Stephen); 04-30-2010 at 01:38 AM.
Posted by YUPAPA, 05-01-2010, 10:39 AM
Why the servers with the same processor yield different results? Just look at the processing related tests and disregard the disk tests. I assume these are tested while the systems are idle?
Posted by EGS, 05-03-2010, 02:09 AM
TQ! <3EGS
Posted by DoYouSpeakWak??, 05-03-2010, 12:42 PM
I got this strange error. Iwe run this many times, still the same, it stops right before its completed. Any ideas why i get this error ?
Posted by JoieDeMort, 05-04-2010, 04:07 PM
New VPS from WiredTree with 1024 RAM and cPanel http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=945791 I presume it is 32-bit CentOS.
Posted by david3, 05-13-2010, 10:43 PM
Linode 360 VPS 360 MB RAM, CentOS 5.4 (32 bit)
Posted by Bono_, 05-15-2010, 08:35 AM
Debian 32Bit, 4GB and 500GB SATA.
Posted by Curly Mike, 05-16-2010, 01:24 PM
This is my home box to play with, I put together recently PIII 800EB (133*6), 382Mb RAM, HDD 120Gb WD IDE UltraDMA 4+ no overclocking Linux 2.6.26-2-686 Debian Lenny, 32bit Couldn't help posting how it scored
Posted by DMEHosting, 05-27-2010, 08:01 PM
I feel dumb asking this, but I was just going to try this out for the heck of it but I keep getting errors? (The list is a lot longer, but i'm only showing the last few lines): ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: implicit declaration of function âglGetStringâ ./src/ubgears.c:632: error: âGL_RENDERERâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:632: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:633: error: âGL_VERSIONâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:633: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:634: error: âGL_VENDORâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:634: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:635: error: âGL_EXTENSIONSâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:635: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ./src/ubgears.c:641: warning: implicit declaration of function âevent_loopâ ./src/ubgears.c:643: warning: implicit declaration of function âglXDestroyContextâ ./src/ubgears.c:645: warning: implicit declaration of function âXDestroyWindowâ ./src/ubgears.c:646: warning: implicit declaration of function âXCloseDisplayâ make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 ********************************************** Run: "make all" failed; aborting I'm not sure what the problem is, I did the "make" part of the files and it's installed on this server. When doing "make", it's showing similar errors. This is a CentOS 5.5 64Bit system.
Posted by ShaneAu, 05-27-2010, 08:52 PM
yum install mesa-libGL-devel libXext-devel
Posted by HUGOBLUE, 05-28-2010, 05:42 AM
Did you remember to disable the graphic benchmark?
Posted by DMEHosting, 05-29-2010, 08:05 PM
Already got it to work. ShaneAu was right about the 2 packages needed on the server to run it.
Posted by RJohnson23, 06-01-2010, 09:27 AM
Dual Xeon E5630, 24 GB RAM, 128 GB SSD
Posted by cakehouse, 06-01-2010, 06:13 PM
GigenetCloud test 0.60 CGhz ,384.00 MB RAM, 15.00 GB Hard Drive Last edited by cakehouse; 06-01-2010 at 06:21 PM.
Posted by netroby, 06-03-2010, 08:52 PM
Share the UnixBenchmarks result with QuickWeb 100TB VZ1
Posted by henkkaweb, 06-04-2010, 04:13 PM
This is the result of the Giga-international's new VPS'es. 4GB RAM, 4 Cores. Not bad for a 20 euros VPS i think
Posted by SDS-Michael, 06-06-2010, 04:15 PM
Burst.NET - OpenVZ VPS2
Posted by diesel12, 06-07-2010, 11:55 PM
Sorry to be incredibly dense, but how do you run the test without testing I/O or by running I/O separately?
Posted by diesel12, 06-08-2010, 12:59 AM
Looks like this is how to run and skip disks in case anyone else is wondering.... ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by mrm2005, 06-10-2010, 11:11 AM
Hi, ValueVPS 128MB Xen VPS
Posted by mrm2005, 06-10-2010, 11:13 AM
Hi, ValueVPS OpenVZ 128MB VPS
Posted by mrm2005, 06-10-2010, 11:16 AM
Hi, EUROPHASE UK 128MB Xen VPS
Posted by HKPlane, 06-16-2010, 10:57 AM
AthlonII x2 240, 2GB ram, 1TB hardware RAID1, CentOS 5.5 64bit I just got a new server setup from volumedrive today and run the benchmark immediately. The speed is great.
Posted by strat, 06-16-2010, 03:54 PM
OS: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) + DirectAdmin CPU: 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz HDD: 1 x 500GB - ST3500418AS RAM: 8GB OS: CentOS release 5.4 (Final) + DirectAdmin CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz HDD: 1 x 1TB - WDC WD10EADS RAM: 8GB Anyone know why the Q9650 box comes up as CPU 0: unknown Even when i check /proc/cpuinfo Last edited by strat; 06-16-2010 at 04:06 PM.
Posted by HKPlane, 06-17-2010, 04:54 AM
The same server in my previous post. This time run the test without disk test. ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8
Posted by barry[CoffeeSprout], 06-20-2010, 06:03 AM
DatabaseByDesignLLC new monster VPS (10 GB Ram, 6 vCPU, Centos 5.5 x86_64)
Posted by Fastrackservers, 06-20-2010, 12:53 PM
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz 24GB Ram
Posted by Kurogane, 06-20-2010, 06:16 PM
I got this strange error. Any ideas why i get this error ?
Posted by mudassirjaved, 06-20-2010, 08:14 PM
i got this error when enter this command tar -zxvf unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz
Posted by devonblzx, 06-20-2010, 11:46 PM
Fairly easy to read what is happening, the file doesn't exist. Was there an error with the download? (P.S. I hope you aren't managing your own servers)
Posted by BradQ, 06-21-2010, 12:02 AM
WIN. That's awesome.
Posted by mudassirjaved, 06-21-2010, 02:47 AM
i do not maintain my main servers, but sign up for new server to learn linux...
Posted by RHServices, 06-23-2010, 12:50 AM
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 4GB RAM 1X 500GB SATA HDD CentOS 5.5 x86_64
Posted by eahpk, 06-23-2010, 01:24 AM
what is the command to find this?
Posted by RHServices, 06-23-2010, 02:00 AM
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 4GB RAM 1X 500GB SATA HDD CentOS 5.5 x86_64 This time without hdd tests
Posted by danclough, 06-25-2010, 12:54 PM
My Craptastic Colo Machine HP DL360 G3 Debian 5.0 x86 2x Intel Xeon 3.06Ghz, 533Mhz FSB 2GB DDR333 ECC RAM 2x 73GB U320, RAID1
Posted by SDS-Michael, 06-25-2010, 01:04 PM
That's not really a bad machine, likely uses a lot of power tho.
Posted by danclough, 06-25-2010, 01:51 PM
Yeah, it's pretty rugged for the most part. All I do with it is host my personal websites and database and run a Tor relay. But I'm screwed if I ever get slashdotted, that thing would melt. In siege benchmarks I hit 85%CPU on all 4 virtual cores with ~350 concurrency. And I can't even run ESX4.
Posted by eahpk, 06-25-2010, 07:58 PM
can anyone tell me the command for this
Posted by devonblzx, 06-26-2010, 12:16 AM
Its on the first post: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...15&postcount=1
Posted by eahpk, 06-26-2010, 01:18 AM
Thanks i get this error -bash: ./Run: No such file or directory
Posted by VL-Adam, 06-26-2010, 01:29 AM
Did you wget the original .tar.gz and cd into that directory after extracting it? These are the commands: wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com...h-5.1.2.tar.gz tar -zxvf unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz cd unixbench-5.1.2 make ./Run I assume you forgotten to wget the file since the command wasn't given in the original post.
Posted by eahpk, 06-26-2010, 01:39 AM
now i get this error
Posted by florentin, 06-28-2010, 08:13 AM
agnihost.com U-VPS 2 Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 270 1992.709 MHz Ubuntu 10.04, 32 bit Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 28 2010 08:11:37 - 10:25:36 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 7668791.3 lps (10.2 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1616.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1587.9 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 140684.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 45754.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 184601.2 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 419691.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 113016.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4499.9 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1590.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 256.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 555732.2 lps (10.2 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 7668791.3 657.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1616.6 293.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 1587.9 369.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 140684.8 355.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 45754.0 276.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 184601.2 318.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 419691.6 337.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 113016.7 282.5 Process Creation 126.0 4499.9 357.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1590.6 375.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 256.4 427.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 555732.2 370.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 358.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 28 2010 10:25:36 - 11:57:23 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8250419.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6186.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1599.1 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 288509.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 95892.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 401332.5 KBps (30.2 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 471350.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 132439.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4696.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2509.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 321.1 lpm (60.4 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 546383.7 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8250419.5 707.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6186.2 1124.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 1599.1 371.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 288509.8 728.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 95892.5 579.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 401332.5 692.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 471350.2 378.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 132439.9 331.1 Process Creation 126.0 4696.8 372.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2509.5 591.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 321.1 535.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 546383.7 364.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 527.7
Posted by Andrew Moore, 07-02-2010, 01:38 PM
Quad Core Xeon E5520, 12GB DDR3.
Posted by LucR, 07-09-2010, 09:28 AM
FutureHosting VPS
Posted by strat, 07-10-2010, 11:45 AM
DC: OVH EG SSD OS: CentOS release 5.5 64Bit (Final) + DirectAdmin CPU: Intel Xeon W3520 RAM: 12GB DDR3 HDD: 2x80GB Intel SSD X-25M in RAID0
Posted by Sandeep Dahiya, 07-14-2010, 12:03 PM
Well, You are not going to believe this one, But I didn't understand what you have posted. can Anyone help me please.
Posted by SteeLeR, 07-17-2010, 05:55 PM
VPS Virtualization: OpenVZ OS: CentOS 5 32bit. RAM: 1GB, 2GB burst 9.99/mo at NixCom.ca: System Benchmarks Index Score 1334.1
Posted by SteeLeR, 07-17-2010, 06:54 PM
Now same server above without disk test
Posted by ZKuJoe, 07-18-2010, 06:10 AM
For those having the error with the make (-lXext) I had to create a symlink for libXext.so using libXext.so.6.4.0 in /usr/lib64. Results from a GigeNETCloud 384MB RAM VM I just created using CentOS 5.5 x86_64:
Posted by h4wk, 07-19-2010, 12:14 AM
ThrustVPS 512RAM - Ubuntu 10.04 32bit
Posted by Tom,, 07-21-2010, 10:18 PM
ThrustVPS 512MB CentOS 5.5 32bit UK
Posted by david3, 07-24-2010, 10:57 PM
h4wk: Is this with OpenVZ, Xen PV, or Xen HVM? And also, do you mind sharing which data center it's at? Thanks. Tom: Is this with OpenVZ, Xen PV, or Xen HVM? Thanks.
Posted by david3, 07-24-2010, 11:06 PM
RackVM xUK-128-VZ VPS (UK) OpenVZ, 15GB disk, 150GB monthly bandwidth, 128MB guaranteed RAM, 256MB burstable RAM CentOS 5.5 64 bit
Posted by Tom,, 07-25-2010, 06:29 PM
OpenVZ.
Posted by david3, 07-26-2010, 01:44 AM
Thrust::VPS Aquatic plan (Los Angeles, CA) Xen PV, 512MB RAM, 512MB Swap, 15GB Disk Space, 1TB Transfer CentOS 5.5 32 bit (Looks like a single CPU core is available)
Posted by h4wk, 07-26-2010, 02:04 AM
It is Xen PV.
Posted by PCS-Chris, 07-26-2010, 06:23 PM
xenSmart PV XS-512
Posted by Sakuya, 07-26-2010, 08:15 PM
Intel i7 920 12GB RAM 4TB HDD in raid0 Gentoo I've also got a cruddy CeleronD with Gentoo too, I'll run that test later.
Posted by david3, 07-30-2010, 04:55 AM
RackVM xUK-256 VPS (UK) Xen, 20GB disk, 200GB monthly bandwidth, 256MB RAM, 512MB swap CentOS 5.5 64 bit
Posted by PCS-Chris, 07-30-2010, 05:42 PM
xenSmart HVM Platform (HVM-512 Plan, 512MB RAM, 30GB HDD)
Posted by jooblogs, 07-30-2010, 09:26 PM
Unixy dedicated: 210$ / month Last edited by jooblogs; 07-30-2010 at 09:32 PM.
Posted by HUGOBLUE, 08-01-2010, 07:36 AM
NordicVPS new OpenVZ package
Posted by cmimrie, 08-01-2010, 07:50 AM
VPSFarm IAD.2G 2048MB Memory, 80GB Hard Disk Drive
Posted by cmimrie, 08-01-2010, 05:18 PM
Gigenetcloud 384MB Memory, 15GB Hard Disk Space
Posted by cmimrie, 08-02-2010, 02:45 PM
ThePlanet Cloud Server 1024MB Memory, 60GB Hard Disk Drive
Posted by ivytony, 08-03-2010, 04:48 PM
eNetSouth Cloud VPS 1024 MB RAM, ~$12/month
Posted by hotpass105, 08-03-2010, 08:34 PM
IGXHost Xen-768MB ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pip e context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by cmimrie, 08-04-2010, 05:11 AM
Linode 1024 1024MB Memory, 32GB Hard Disk Drive
Posted by Compy247, 08-04-2010, 01:36 PM
Spacerich 512 MB Chicago 100 Mb\s plan: Last edited by Compy247; 08-04-2010 at 01:44 PM.
Posted by david3, 08-05-2010, 12:16 AM
RackVM xUK-256 VPS (UK) - On UK00 server Xen, 20GB disk, 200GB monthly bandwidth, 256MB RAM, 512MB swap CentOS 5.5 64 bit
Posted by BurakUeda, 08-06-2010, 02:29 AM
Intel Core2Quad Q9300 2.5Ghz / 8GB Ram @ Quadranet (AKA Pacific Rack)
Posted by henkkaweb, 08-06-2010, 11:15 AM
Does someone have bechmark of Hetzner's Root Server RP39?
Posted by david3, 08-07-2010, 12:18 AM
eNS Cloud VPS from eNetSouth 512 MB RAM, 1 GB Swap VMware CentOS 5.5 (32 bit)
Posted by iamwf, 08-07-2010, 02:42 AM
eNS Cloud VPS from eNetSouth 768 MB RAM, 1.5 GB Swap VMware CentOS 5.5 (32 bit) Last edited by iamwf; 08-07-2010 at 02:44 AM. Reason: Removing my domain name
Posted by cmimrie, 08-07-2010, 07:52 AM
xenSmart HVM 1024MB 1024MB Memory, 60GB Hard Disk Drive
Posted by Andrew Moore, 08-10-2010, 06:07 PM

Posted by h4wk, 08-13-2010, 09:52 PM
BlueMile VMware VPS
Posted by WebNX, 08-14-2010, 10:49 PM

Posted by WebHostX, 08-15-2010, 08:05 AM
Sorry for my bad english When run command "make" there's error display ./src/ubgears.c:341: warning: implicit declaration of function âglEnableâ ./src/ubgears.c:341: error: âGL_CULL_FACEâ undeclared (first use in this functio n) ./src/ubgears.c:342: error: âGL_LIGHTINGâ undeclared (first use in this function ) ./src/ubgears.c:344: error: âGL_DEPTH_TESTâ undeclared (first use in this functi on) ./src/ubgears.c:347: error: âgear1â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:347: warning: implicit declaration of function âglGenListsâ ./src/ubgears.c:348: warning: implicit declaration of function âglNewListâ ./src/ubgears.c:348: error: âGL_COMPILEâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function âglMaterialfvâ ./src/ubgears.c:349: error: âGL_FRONTâ undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:349: error: âGL_AMBIENT_AND_DIFFUSEâ undeclared (first use in th is function) ./src/ubgears.c:350: warning: implicit declaration of function âgearâ ./src/ubgears.c:351: warning: implicit declaration of function âglEndListâ ./src/ubgears.c:353: error: âgear2â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:359: error: âgear3â undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/ubgears.c:365: error: âGL_NORMALIZEâ undeclared (first use in this function) . . . . many error . . . . My vps is CentOS 5
Posted by hosting4life, 08-15-2010, 08:18 AM
Try the following command; yum install libXext-devel
Posted by WebHostX, 08-16-2010, 05:48 AM
@ Hosting4life: Thanks, it's work like charm Here's scores of my VPs VPS from Switchlink Memory: 256 MB Burst / Swap: 256 MB Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 2010 14:26:05 - 14:53:58 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10143721.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2174.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3725.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 416129.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124900.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 836649.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 797903.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 237856.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 11210.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4032.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 559.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 735231.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10143721.7 869.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2174.0 395.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 3725.9 866.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 416129.9 1050.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 124900.1 754.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 836649.4 1442.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 797903.7 641.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 237856.8 594.6 Process Creation 126.0 11210.2 889.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4032.2 951.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 559.2 932.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 735231.8 490.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 779.3 ZipServers PLAN 2 - VPS w/ cPanel, DA, or Plesk RAM: 768MB Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 2010 01:26:30 - 01:54:20 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10711910.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2147.9 MWIPS (8.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3958.4 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 546828.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 145714.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1312122.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 990337.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 22626.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12579.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5283.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1686.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 837127.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10711910.5 917.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2147.9 390.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 3958.4 920.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 546828.8 1380.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 145714.0 880.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1312122.6 2262.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 990337.9 796.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 22626.2 56.6 Process Creation 126.0 12579.4 998.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5283.6 1246.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1686.9 2811.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 837127.7 558.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 810.0 Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 2010 01:54:20 - 02:22:25 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 36816427.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9089.9 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 14164.9 lps (29.4 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 580719.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 158864.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1456253.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3593404.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1076001.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 42695.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18769.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2569.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3299616.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 36816427.0 3154.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9089.9 1652.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 14164.9 3294.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 580719.9 1466.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 158864.3 959.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1456253.7 2510.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3593404.8 2888.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1076001.1 2690.0 Process Creation 126.0 42695.8 3388.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18769.2 4426.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2569.4 4282.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3299616.4 2199.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2523.4 Delimiter VPS - Amsterdam - OpenVZ - VPS 100 - Amsterdam - OpenVZ RAM: 1.5GB RAM, 4GB Burst RAM Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 2010 02:10:35 - 02:39:07 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12862079.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2667.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2625.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 492443.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 152540.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 691987.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1365264.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 313355.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7667.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3596.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 709.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1969552.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12862079.6 1102.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2667.8 485.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 2625.5 610.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 492443.9 1243.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 152540.5 921.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 691987.3 1193.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1365264.2 1097.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 313355.2 783.4 Process Creation 126.0 7667.6 608.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3596.9 848.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 709.2 1182.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1969552.5 1313.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 906.4 Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 16 2010 02:39:07 - 03:14:35 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25637304.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 21181.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3493.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210825.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 66918.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 371830.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2682097.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 636547.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10631.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5003.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 670.8 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2239792.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25637304.8 2196.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21181.3 3851.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 3493.9 812.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210825.6 532.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 66918.0 404.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 371830.5 641.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2682097.8 2156.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 636547.9 1591.4 Process Creation 126.0 10631.7 843.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5003.4 1180.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 670.8 1117.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2239792.8 1493.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1151.1 newwebsite Advanced VPS OpenVZ 768 MB RAM 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10013801.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2122.9 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3151.2 lps (29.4 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 387132.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 110769.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 698149.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 695427.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 203299.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10648.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3374.7 lpm (63.4 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 965.6 lpm (62.2 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 606394.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10013801.1 858.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2122.9 386.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 3151.2 732.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 387132.3 977.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 110769.8 669.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 698149.1 1203.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 695427.3 559.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 203299.6 508.2 Process Creation 126.0 10648.3 845.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3374.7 795.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 965.6 1609.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 606394.5 404.3 ======== 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38718784.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 8448.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5985.9 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 347547.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74690.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 732718.5 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2760681.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 892927.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 19230.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8176.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1259.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1740136.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38718784.2 3317.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8448.4 1536.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 5985.9 1392.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 347547.0 877.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74690.0 451.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 732718.5 1263.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2760681.6 2219.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 892927.8 2232.3 Process Creation 126.0 19230.3 1526.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8176.3 1928.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1259.9 2099.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1740136.3 1160.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1496.4
Posted by phydiux, 08-19-2010, 08:49 AM
I've been testing a few VPSs, trying to determine what will work best for me. Here are benchmarks from a few providers that I have been testing: NordicVPS / San Jose - Xen 512MB RAM / 15GB HD / 1000GB transfer / $9.95/Mo. : enscloud.com - eNetSouth - openVZ 384MB RAM / 40GB HD / 1500GB transfer / $7.99 : buyvm.net (frantech.ca) - openVZ 512/1024MB RAM / 50Gb HD / 2000GB transfer / $5.95 : linnode 512 - Xen 512MB RAM / 16GB HD / 200Gb transfer / $19.95 : I also dusted off an old machine I had sitting in my basement - PentiumD 945 2GB RAM, IDE 200GB HDD: And finally, compared these results to a virtual machine running on a vmware server with 1 processor and 512Mb of RAM: I have another vmware server I might do some testing on, but I haven't performed the test yet. I was surprised that the PentiumD 945 ranks higher in the single thread test over a single core of a Q8200 - that just doesn't seem right?
Posted by asmar, 08-22-2010, 03:43 PM
This is mine, on a single i7 920 2.67GHz with 12GB RAM and 2x73GB raptor drives on Hardware RAID 1.
Posted by david3, 08-23-2010, 05:53 AM
DirectSpace DSVPS1 (Portland, OR) 512MB guaranteed RAM, 1GB burstable RAM 2TB monthly bandwidth, 20GB disk OpenVZ CentOS 5.5 32 bit
Posted by david3, 08-24-2010, 05:07 AM
Linode 512 (Fremont, CA) 3+ months after setup 512MB RAM, 512MB Swap 200GB transfer, 16GB disk Xen CentOS 5.5 32 bit
Posted by joxxer, 08-24-2010, 08:43 AM
CPU:AMD Opteron 1381/RAM:4 GB DDR2-800/@ Strato Germany _______________________________________________________
Posted by razzezz, 08-24-2010, 11:28 AM
Switchlink OpenVZ VPS-500 1 CPU/256MB/10GB HDD/300GB Bandwidth £5.99/Month Switchlink OpenVZ VPS-2000 2 CPU/2GB/80GB HDD/1500GB Bandwidth £34.99/Month
Posted by Melancholia, 08-28-2010, 07:51 AM
Colo'd: Dual Intel Xeon L5410ES (8x2.33GHZ) 12GB ECC Reg RAM 1.5TB RE3 HW RAID-10 ______________________________________________________________ Default test: Same server, using ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16: HECK YEAH! to say the least, I'm quite happy with the results
Posted by BLundy-Tegatai, 08-30-2010, 06:39 AM
Testing out our OpenVZ VPS, heres the results: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: test: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.2 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 14:55:39 MSD 2010 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (3999.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET 12:57:29 up 6:53, 0 users, load average: 0.50, 1.09, 4.55; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 12:57:29 - 13:21:17 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16849972.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1742.3 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1077.9 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1529981.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 18746.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2211.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2246.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 936.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1288.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2176824.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16849972.4 1443.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1742.3 316.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 1077.9 250.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1529981.8 1229.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 18746.8 46.9 Process Creation 126.0 2211.7 175.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2246.3 529.8 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 936.3 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1288.2 2146.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2176824.6 1451.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 498.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 13:21:17 - 13:45:09 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 135815247.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14149.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5323.3 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 12328200.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2474675.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8923.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16392.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1101.4 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2196.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2109709.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 135815247.5 11638.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14149.2 2572.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 5323.3 1238.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12328200.3 9910.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2474675.0 6186.7 Process Creation 126.0 8923.6 708.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16392.7 3866.2 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1101.4 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2196.3 3660.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2109709.5 1406.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 3166.8
Posted by BLundy-Tegatai, 08-30-2010, 08:28 AM
Heres run two... Tegatai OpenVZ VPS: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: test: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.2 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 14:55:39 MSD 2010 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (3999.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET 04:23:56 up 1:20, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 3.25, 6.37; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 04:23:56 - 04:47:44 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17307114.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1768.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2131.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1559450.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 25631.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4955.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4195.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 868.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1591.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2211247.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17307114.0 1483.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1768.5 321.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2131.9 495.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1559450.1 1253.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25631.4 64.1 Process Creation 126.0 4955.9 393.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4195.6 989.5 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 868.9 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1591.2 2652.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2211247.9 1474.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 674.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 04:47:44 - 05:11:35 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 134118949.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14300.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4947.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 12417790.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2504637.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8635.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14485.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 971.0 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1941.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2059123.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 134118949.5 11492.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14300.9 2600.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 4947.6 1150.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12417790.9 9982.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2504637.5 6261.6 Process Creation 126.0 8635.8 685.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14485.5 3416.4 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 971.0 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1941.3 3235.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2059123.1 1372.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 3042.7 root@test:~/unixbench-5.1.2#
Posted by melinite, 08-30-2010, 02:14 PM
Ubiquity Dedicated 8GB RAM, Xeon x3220, Centos 5.5 64bit
Posted by melinite, 08-30-2010, 02:17 PM
Linode 768 Atlanta Ubuntu Lucid
Posted by whradmin, 09-02-2010, 12:42 PM
carohosting, pentium D 2.8, 3GB RAM, 2TB bandwidth, 160GB hdd, 80$/month..
Posted by whradmin, 09-02-2010, 01:41 PM

Posted by BLundy-Tegatai, 09-02-2010, 11:29 PM
Having some strange results when comparing OpenVZ and Xen Paravirt on the same exact hardware. Same BIOS settings, same general CentOS 5.5 config, etc. I'm using Opteron 6128's, with 32GB of DDR3 1333Mhz, WD RE3 on Adaptec 2405 SATA RAID, so the xen scores seem low. As far as OpenVZ goes the results seem about right when comparing to others, and like a linear improvement when comparing single to 8 cores. When looking at single vs 8 cores on xen however, the unixbench scores do not present a linear increase in performance... which puzzles me to say the least. Anyone run into this sort of oddity before? Scores are posted below for reference, OpenVZ Benchmark: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: test: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.2 -- #1 SMP Tue Jul 6 14:55:39 MSD 2010 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (3999.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SY SCALL/SYSRET 04:23:56 up 1:20, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 3.25, 6.37; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 04:23:56 - 04:47:44 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17307114.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1768.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2131.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1559450.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 25631.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4955.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4195.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 868.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1591.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2211247.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17307114.0 1483.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1768.5 321.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2131.9 495.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1559450.1 1253.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25631.4 64.1 Process Creation 126.0 4955.9 393.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4195.6 989.5 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 868.9 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1591.2 2652.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2211247.9 1474.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 674.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Aug 30 2010 04:47:44 - 05:11:35 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 134118949.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14300.9 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4947.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 12417790.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2504637.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8635.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14485.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 971.0 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1941.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2059123.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 134118949.5 11492.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14300.9 2600.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 4947.6 1150.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12417790.9 9982.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2504637.5 6261.6 Process Creation 126.0 8635.8 685.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14485.5 3416.4 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 971.0 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1941.3 3235.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2059123.1 1372.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 3042.7 Xen Paravirt on Same Gear: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: tibet2.tegataiphoenix.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-308-ec2 -- #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 04:03:34 UTC 2010 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4001.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 22:21:30 up 1:21, 2 users, load average: 0.72, 3.67, 7.05; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 02 2010 22:21:30 - 22:42:35 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17719528.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1783.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 865.4 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 261327.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 25532.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1810.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2563.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 720.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 279812.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17719528.7 1518.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1783.4 324.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 865.4 201.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 261327.2 210.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 25532.8 63.8 Process Creation 126.0 1810.1 143.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2563.7 604.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 720.5 1200.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 279812.2 186.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 309.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Sep 02 2010 22:42:35 - 23:03:35 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 140004276.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14203.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1944.2 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2084550.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 252928.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3541.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5838.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 786.3 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1820558.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 140004276.9 11996.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14203.0 2582.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 1944.2 452.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2084550.7 1675.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252928.9 632.3 Process Creation 126.0 3541.1 281.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5838.3 1377.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 786.3 1310.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1820558.9 1213.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 1278.6
Posted by david3, 09-03-2010, 11:47 PM
123Systems VPS (Chicago, IL) Linux-256-SolusVM-Special 256MB Guaranteed RAM, 512MB Burstable RAM 10GB disk space, 500GB monthly transfer OpenVZ CentOS 5.5 (32 bit)
Posted by tepid, 09-04-2010, 05:17 AM
Dual E5420 24GB RAM w/ File Copy tests without file copy test
Posted by Kurikami, 09-05-2010, 10:54 AM
From newwebsite.com - Centos with DA on Xen with 512 MB RAM and 8 CPU Cores
Posted by w4r3z, 09-06-2010, 12:33 PM
Testing www.virpus.com -------------------- U-Basic: 25GB HDD 512MB/2GB IPs:2 BT: 1.56TB US$: 5 vCPUS: 4 @ 2.8GHz OS: Centos 5.5 32bit -------------------- with File Copy tests without file copy test Last edited by w4r3z; 09-06-2010 at 12:43 PM.
Posted by w4r3z, 09-06-2010, 02:07 PM
Testing www.virpus.com -------------------- U-Basic: 25GB HDD 512MB/2GB IPs:2 BT: 1.56TB US$: 5 vCPUS: 4 @ 2.8GHz OS: Centos 5.5 64bit --------------------- without file copy test
Posted by Kurikami, 09-07-2010, 10:52 AM
Trial of server4.de x4 on centos 5.2 + plesk CPU is limited to 3000hz as I understand, so seems to be good.
Posted by ante, 09-09-2010, 05:57 PM
old vps 512 and i hate it i got this points lol i thos i well get 100 !!!
Posted by Fed83, 09-13-2010, 06:26 AM
JaguarPC VPS 384MB RAM / 1GB Burst without file copy: with file copy:
Posted by Ryan G - Limestone, 09-14-2010, 08:25 PM
Supermicro X8DTU-F with Dual Intel X5650 CPUs, 50GB of DDR3 ECC RAM, and a 30GB Intel SSD ./Run ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by voidSecurity, 09-22-2010, 05:27 AM
E5620/24GBRAM/2TB/4x500GB/ -$650 / 100TB
Posted by PCS-Chris, 09-25-2010, 04:58 PM
Core i7 920, 6GB RAM, 1.5TB WD Green SATA HDD Stock CentOS Kernel: Custom SSM Kernel:
Posted by david3, 09-27-2010, 05:57 AM
123Systems VPS (Chicago, IL) Linux-256-SolusVM-Special 256MB Guaranteed RAM, 512MB Burstable RAM 10GB disk space, 500GB monthly transfer OpenVZ CentOS 5.5 (32 bit) NOTE: This is an updated benchmark, after being moved from a Q9550 to an E5620. You can see the earlier benchmark here.
Posted by Kamejoko, 10-03-2010, 05:57 AM
Softlayer Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3230 @ 2.66GHz, 8GB RAM, 73GB 15K SAS ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Oct 02 2010 23:19:11 - 23:47:46 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24077904.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3141.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2961.3 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 627873.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 188845.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1049359.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1386556.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 202624.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8304.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8121.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2544.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1827449.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24077904.2 2063.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3141.5 571.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 2961.3 688.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 627873.9 1585.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 188845.3 1141.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1049359.6 1809.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1386556.8 1114.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 202624.2 506.6 Process Creation 126.0 8304.6 659.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8121.5 1915.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2544.7 4241.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1827449.4 1218.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1209.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Oct 02 2010 23:47:46 - 00:16:28 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 96609341.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 12527.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 11642.3 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 355676.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 108331.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1110599.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5511727.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1267531.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 33259.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20958.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2767.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2958504.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 96609341.8 8278.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12527.0 2277.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 11642.3 2707.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 355676.8 898.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 108331.7 654.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1110599.6 1914.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5511727.4 4430.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1267531.7 3168.8 Process Creation 126.0 33259.8 2639.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20958.1 4942.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2767.2 4612.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2958504.2 1972.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2600.8
Posted by keith007, 10-05-2010, 04:43 PM
Cheap dedi xeon 2.6ghz 4gb ram Keith
Posted by Tom,, 10-07-2010, 09:20 AM
OVH France
Posted by AdamD, 10-07-2010, 11:31 AM
Running on an OVH MG Hybrid Intel Bi Xeon E5504 16 GB DDR3 Intel SSD X25-M 2x 80 GB 2x 750 GB Sata 2 Drives.
Posted by Yikes2000, 10-08-2010, 02:19 AM
The OP has good intention, but this thread has made server comparison more difficult, not easier. The original UnixBench-WHT thread has been collecting benchmark results since 2004. While not perfect, it provides a historical perspective. One can search for keywords and quickly compare a brand new Xeon 7320 against an ancient P4 Northwood. Now 6 years of benchmark data is deprecated. For what? The new version 5.1.2 adds 2D / 3D graphics tests and is SMP aware, i.e. it will run the benchmark twice - once with one single process, another with N processes where N equals to the number of CPU cores. Sounds great. But wait, the OP overrides it (no graphics tests) and instructs everyone to run 1, 8, 16 processes. What happens when systems with 24, 32, or more CPU cores show up? Start another round of benchmark results?! The value of these benchmark threads is in their history, not how the benchmark tests are run. The old version runs 8 concurrent processes. For more CPU cores, one can manually run the benchmark with more processes. Rather than closing that old thread, both threads should be kept alive for a number of years until the new one builds enough data points. I looked up the old UnixBench thread to see if I should upgrade my server to dual Xeon 5320 from dual Woodcrest 5130. I can't because 5320 is too new (the thread was closed), and 5130 isn't in the new thread. (And I don't want to run the new benchmark on 5130 because the server is already populated.) Sigh...
Posted by Nnyan, 10-14-2010, 08:25 PM
6Sync 512MB beta VPS w/o disk: will run with later Last edited by Nnyan; 10-14-2010 at 08:28 PM.
Posted by devonblzx, 10-22-2010, 05:43 PM
I agree, the OP wasn't comparing Unixbench 4 and 5 scores he was comparing 4-WHT and 5 scores. Your version scored completely different and now it is impossible to compare. He also stated how Xen scored badly on 4-WHT and not 5 but I have still found Xen benchmarks poorly on this test compared to native.
Posted by dreamnetua, 10-27-2010, 04:09 AM
Intel atom D525 1.8 2 Gb Ram DDR3 2x320HDD Soft raid 44$ in data center dream.net.ua dream.net.ua/dedicated.html
Posted by david3, 10-31-2010, 04:20 AM
BuyVM VPS (Fremont, CA) 128MB Guaranteed RAM, 256MB Burstable RAM OpenVZ CentOS 5.5 (32 bit)
Posted by SDS-Michael, 10-31-2010, 09:26 PM
HP Pavilion dv6000 Laptop Core 2 Duo T5550 3GB RAM Ubuntu 10.10
Posted by vpsbuster, 11-04-2010, 04:52 PM
Unixbench 5.1.2 does not compile on newly installed Ubuntu 10.04 Is there a list of requirements to get it to compile? Are they mentioned anywhere in this thread? I also suspect the default compiler and some if the options and switches may be incompatible - gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) Last edited by vpsbuster; 11-04-2010 at 05:04 PM.
Posted by MMrs, 11-05-2010, 04:48 PM

Posted by DMEHosting, 11-15-2010, 10:15 PM
Been running this on a new build of a server for testing, and for some reason the Unixbench always crashes once it gets to "1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1" stage. It crashes the whole node. I tested all the hardware and it seemed to be fine, anyone familiar with why that test would crash the server? UnixBench runs fine up unto that point. Just curious
Posted by aoboau, 11-19-2010, 09:53 AM
X3450 8G 4x1T WDBlack $254/m
Posted by Preetam, 11-26-2010, 11:57 PM
Try
Posted by mojojuju, 12-05-2010, 05:01 PM
Level 4 OpenVZ VPS from ClubUptime - 4GB/6GB memory. $20/month (after coupon)
Posted by Dougy, 12-09-2010, 12:37 AM
Not to shabby.. its a R200.
Posted by viGeek, 12-09-2010, 12:51 PM
This is a VM in Citrix XenServer 5.6, new deployment, only one VM running with 8 CPU's assigned, 10GB of memory and high resource allocation. The VM itself is a CentOS 5.5 x64 fresh install. Servers Specs: Dual E5405 2.0 GHZ (8 cores) 12GB DDR2 FB-Dimm Memory SuperMicro x7dcl-I 9200SE Raid Controller (Hardware) Dual 1TB Western Digital Raid Editions in RAID1
Posted by viGeek, 12-09-2010, 05:54 PM
Same as above but with the correct kernel etc.
Posted by pmalc, 12-16-2010, 11:27 AM
Clubuptime 512MB Guaranteed 1024MB Burst
Posted by Clinton44, 12-17-2010, 11:06 PM

Posted by JoyceBabu, 12-19-2010, 01:21 AM
Can this be run on a VPS?
Posted by Preetam, 12-19-2010, 01:22 AM
Yes. Many of the previous posts are results from VPSs.
Posted by JoyceBabu, 12-19-2010, 02:17 AM
Thanks .
Posted by Mateuss, 12-19-2010, 09:00 AM
limevps Hetzner.de Server EQ 4
Posted by sherwinaval, 12-20-2010, 01:06 AM
AlienVPS UFO4 ./Run ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by Wojtek, 12-24-2010, 08:38 PM
Dell R310 | X3460 | 8GB DDR3 | 2x 500gb Raid1 ---
Posted by sherwinaval, 12-29-2010, 05:52 AM
got transferred to an LA Node AlienVPS UFO4 ./Run
Posted by Relin, 01-04-2011, 12:42 AM
$75/Month CORE i3 540 3.07GHz x 4 4GB Memory reliablehostingservices
Posted by Mateuss, 01-05-2011, 07:36 AM
Virtuozzo 1 GB Ram, Hdd 20 Gb, BW 200 Gb.
Posted by Mateuss, 01-05-2011, 07:40 AM
Virtuozzo 2 GB Ram, Hdd 100 Gb, BW 2000 Gb. EU Datacenter
Posted by Kurikami, 01-06-2011, 12:14 PM
Eco large from s4u. Not a top score, but it should handle around 300k daily impressions just fine.
Posted by Warlock77, 01-07-2011, 05:38 PM
Im getting this error: Run: "Pipe-based Context Switching": slave read failed: No such file or directory; aborting Someone can help me? Thank you
Posted by Orien, 01-09-2011, 03:18 AM
Super VS 2x Xeon E5620 1536MB RAM
Posted by pmalc, 01-14-2011, 11:51 PM
Ramhost Custom Plan Dual-core Core2 Duo E7400 384M Ram, 90G HDD
Posted by WebGuru72, 01-16-2011, 02:29 AM
Wow these are very impressive results.
Posted by Jakob Rosenberg, 01-17-2011, 09:42 AM
FSCKVPS - 2GB RAM (4Gb Burst), 90Gb Disk Space, 1500Gb Transfer (approx 2.4Ghz guaranteed) $49.95/mo
Posted by dreamnetua, 01-18-2011, 08:13 AM
2xXeon E5345 @ 2.33GHz /8 Gb RAM /Raid 5 3x1Tb HDD <> System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21067235.1 1805.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2730.8 496.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 3104.4 722.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 654778.9 1653.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 193026.3 1166.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 897285.4 1547.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1242133.3 998.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 141502.3 353.8 Process Creation 126.0 5202.0 412.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5996.2 1414.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2913.9 4856.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1619399.2 1079.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1063.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 18 2011 14:39:03 - 15:07:20 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 172570767.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 21803.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 18083.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 438636.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 115672.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 954092.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 9774966.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2270976.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 36583.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 29241.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3908.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2166198.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 172570767.9 14787.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21803.8 3964.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 18083.1 4205.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 438636.7 1107.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 115672.7 698.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 954092.5 1645.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9774966.1 7857.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2270976.9 5677.4 Process Creation 126.0 36583.0 2903.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 29241.7 6896.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3908.0 6513.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2166198.1 1444.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3428.5 Last edited by sirius; 02-09-2011 at 09:04 AM.
Posted by Taylor - Megahertz H, 01-18-2011, 12:17 PM
$57 2.4 dual core, 2gb ram 250HDD 3.2TB BW, 1GB port. but they dont offer this anymore its much newer hardware for same cost ddr3 instead of ddr2 800 and 2.8 dual instead of 2.4 secured servers ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: e2180-20069.securedservers.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Thu May 13 13:08:30 EDT 2010 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2220 @ 2.40GHz (4788.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2220 @ 2.40GHz (4787.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 08:15:28 up 228 days, 6:41, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 18 2011 08:15:28 - 08:44:07 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12988629.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2672.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3634.4 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 340882.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120090.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 646899.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 839718.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 247412.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10723.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4814.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 977.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 683681.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12988629.9 1113.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2672.1 485.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 3634.4 845.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 340882.9 860.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 120090.3 725.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 646899.1 1115.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 839718.0 675.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 247412.7 618.5 Process Creation 126.0 10723.2 851.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4814.6 1135.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 977.5 1629.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 683681.3 455.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 822.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 18 2011 08:44:07 - 09:12:51 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25801704.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5344.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6247.3 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 341446.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 100719.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 722858.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1662074.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 532448.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 18008.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7440.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1028.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1329765.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25801704.7 2210.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5344.1 971.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 6247.3 1452.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 341446.7 862.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 100719.9 608.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 722858.4 1246.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1662074.1 1336.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 532448.8 1331.1 Process Creation 126.0 18008.1 1429.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7440.7 1754.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1028.6 1714.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1329765.8 886.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1244.8
Posted by eva2000, 01-23-2011, 10:55 AM
Local test server VirtualBox CentOS 5.5 64bit GuestXeon W3540 @3408Mhz (Assigned 2 cores only) - linux reports @3375Mhz64MB allocated GPU memory1GB out of 6GB DDR3-1550Mhz20GB out of 640GB Samsung SATAII change to 4 cpu cores VirtualBox CentOS 5.5 64bit GuestXeon W3540 @3408Mhz (Assigned 4 cores only) - linux reports @3375Mhz64MB allocated GPU memory1GB out of 6GB DDR3-1550Mhz20GB out of 640GB Samsung SATAII
Posted by HUGOBLUE, 01-27-2011, 07:28 PM
NordicVPS Fremont OVZ512 VPS with access to 4 cores
Posted by Microlinux, 01-29-2011, 03:42 AM
Doh, wrong version need to re-run. Last edited by Microlinux; 01-29-2011 at 03:55 AM.
Posted by Microlinux, 01-29-2011, 05:01 AM
Core i7 2600 | 12GB | Adaptec 2405 | 4 x 500GB RE3 RAID 10
Posted by Microlinux, 01-29-2011, 07:07 AM
Core i7 2600 | 12GB | Adaptec 2405 | 4 x 500GB RE3 RAID 10
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-01-2011, 04:23 AM
core i5-2500k /4gb RAM / 2x250 soft raid Sata2 <> ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: test: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.i686 -- #1 SMP Mon Oct 18 23:56:17 UTC 2010 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6585.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualizati CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualizati CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualizati CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualizati 20:00:36 up 3:34, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 31 2011 20:00:36 - 20:28:54 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25887854.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3577.4 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4736.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 599595.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 154614.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1792054.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 928894.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 163499.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15924.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6933.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2579.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 894347.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25887854.7 2218.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3577.4 650.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 4736.5 1101.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 599595.9 1514.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 154614.5 934.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1792054.9 3089.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 928894.1 746.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 163499.9 408.7 Process Creation 126.0 15924.9 1263.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6933.9 1635.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2579.4 4299.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 894347.7 596.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1223.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 31 2011 20:28:54 - 20:57:09 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 102845772.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14309.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 21004.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1009925.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 263378.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3300441.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3717613.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1076982.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 62507.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21643.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2959.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3335192.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 102845772.9 8812.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14309.5 2601.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 21004.8 4884.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1009925.8 2550.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 263378.7 1591.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3300441.3 5690.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3717613.7 2988.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1076982.9 2692.5 Process Creation 126.0 62507.5 4960.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21643.8 5104.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2959.2 4932.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3335192.1 2223.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3660.1 Last edited by sirius; 02-09-2011 at 09:03 AM.
Posted by sm69, 02-01-2011, 04:32 AM
Here is the benchmark for AMD Quad Core 9650 with 4GB RAM SATA II
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-01-2011, 05:31 AM
Core i5-2500k /4 GB RAM /2x250 hdd soft raid new kernel 2.6.37-2.fc14.i686.PAE ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: test: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37-2.fc14.i686.PAE -- #1 SMP Tue Jan 11 21:27:19 EET 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, Intel virtualization 10:29:56 up 5 min, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.04; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Feb 01 2011 10:29:56 - 10:58:08 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26756204.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3589.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4723.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 762004.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197969.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2150370.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1335360.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 214449.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15833.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7058.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2646.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2172558.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26756204.3 2292.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3589.8 652.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4723.5 1098.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 762004.4 1924.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197969.0 1196.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2150370.6 3707.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1335360.4 1073.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 214449.1 536.1 Process Creation 126.0 15833.3 1256.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7058.7 1664.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2646.6 4411.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2172558.9 1448.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1477.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Feb 01 2011 10:58:08 - 11:26:23 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 106548994.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14359.6 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 20788.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1037863.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 254275.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3209796.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5304970.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1088202.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 60492.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21998.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2996.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 7403340.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 106548994.6 9130.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14359.6 2610.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 20788.0 4834.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1037863.8 2620.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 254275.7 1536.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3209796.4 5534.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5304970.2 4264.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1088202.4 2720.5 Process Creation 126.0 60492.5 4801.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21998.4 5188.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2996.2 4993.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 7403340.3 4935.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 4028.9
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-01-2011, 10:02 AM
VIA C7-D Processor 1800MHz / 2gb RAM / 250 HDD SATA 2 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: testotaz: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37-2.fc14.i686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 00:04:26 EET 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: VIA C7-D Processor 1800MHz (3591.2 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext 21:27:37 up 13 min, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.15, 0.12; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Feb 01 2011 21:27:37 - 21:55:55 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 3831999.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 531.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 852.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 75895.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 22112.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 196485.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 135569.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 46633.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2595.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 959.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 126.0 lpm (60.5 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 354815.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 3831999.4 328.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 531.3 96.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 852.0 198.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 75895.4 191.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 22112.5 133.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 196485.1 338.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 135569.8 109.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 46633.5 116.6 Process Creation 126.0 2595.0 206.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 959.2 226.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 126.0 210.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 354815.9 236.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 185.0
Posted by sm69, 02-01-2011, 06:01 PM
Benchmark for Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz with 4GB DDR3 1TB SATA II
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-03-2011, 05:35 AM
server Core2Duo <> Core2Duo 7400 / 2Gb RAm /Soft Raid 2x250 HDD Sata II ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: orange.dream.net.ua: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37-2.fc14.i686.PAE -- #1 SMP Tue Jan 11 16:31:25 EET 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz (5572.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz (5570.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 10:38:54 up 11 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.06, 0.07; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Feb 03 2011 10:38:54 - 11:07:14 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15542449.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3051.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3583.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 398013.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 119639.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 952710.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 808027.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 164370.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10791.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4789.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 980.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1388181.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15542449.2 1331.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3051.7 554.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 3583.4 833.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 398013.3 1005.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 119639.5 722.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 952710.0 1642.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 808027.2 649.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 164370.2 410.9 Process Creation 126.0 10791.5 856.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4789.2 1129.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 980.8 1634.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1388181.9 925.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 901.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Feb 03 2011 11:07:14 - 11:35:35 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31360618.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6098.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 7304.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 677541.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 195723.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1651547.8 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1624742.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 377682.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 20192.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7443.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 980.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2643052.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31360618.7 2687.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6098.0 1108.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 7304.4 1698.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 677541.9 1711.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 195723.7 1182.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1651547.8 2847.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1624742.1 1306.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 377682.7 944.2 Process Creation 126.0 20192.4 1602.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7443.3 1755.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 980.9 1634.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2643052.4 1762.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1604.6 Last edited by sirius; 02-09-2011 at 09:02 AM.
Posted by WW_P, 02-04-2011, 11:32 AM
IMO not bad for 23euro per month, 3Gb dedicated ram, Paravirtualization, 100Gb HDD, 5Tb Traffic Sysinfo: 1 Core: 8 Core:
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-09-2011, 06:28 AM
Rent server Zacate AMD E-350 Processor 1.6 /2Gb RAM /2xHDD 320 SATA III $43 <> Last edited by sirius; 02-09-2011 at 09:02 AM.
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-09-2011, 11:07 AM
Genuine Intel(R) 2160 @ 1.80GHz /2Gb Ram /2x250 HDD
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-10-2011, 10:52 AM
VPS in holland AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ 256 MEM
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-10-2011, 10:53 AM
Dedicated server Atom 330 /2 GB RAM /250 HDD
Posted by razzezz, 02-10-2011, 11:57 AM
http://uk-vps.co -> Basic Centos 32Bit VPS -> 752MB RAM
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-11-2011, 04:41 AM
Intel P4 3.0 /1 GB RAM /2x250 HDD Last edited by dreamnetua; 02-11-2011 at 04:51 AM.
Posted by wdt, 02-12-2011, 03:27 PM
1x Intel Xeon Westmere X5650 @ 2.66GHz (6 core), 12 GB RAM ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 With 2x 300 SAS 15K in RAID 1 hardware, "./Run" score was only 5442.5
Posted by sm69, 02-12-2011, 06:46 PM
Benchmark for Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz with 8GB DDR3 1TB SATA II
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-16-2011, 05:40 PM
Core i5-2400s /4 gb / 2x640 soft RAID 1 SATA III
Posted by SinnerSaint, 02-17-2011, 06:20 AM
Can I post here the results of my benchmark done with version 5.1.3 of UnixBench? I just noticed that there's a new version so I opted for that one instead of the old 5.1.2. I tested two OpenVZ VPS from urpad.net and hostrail.com using the default settings mentioned in the first post of this thread.
Posted by Neo_Anderson, 02-20-2011, 11:33 AM
Hetzner VQ 19 -> Single Core, Ram 2048 Mb, HD 80 GB
Posted by servlet, 02-23-2011, 01:08 PM
Core2duo 2gb ram ubuntu [code] Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 23 2011 22:06:25 - 22:35:18 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20328122.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4003.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5738.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 506344.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 163321.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1005438.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1197335.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 357908.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 17195.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7042.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 920.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1231327.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20328122.9 1741.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4003.7 727.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 5738.0 1334.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 506344.2 1278.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 163321.5 986.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1005438.1 1733.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1197335.9 962.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 357908.8 894.8 Process Creation 126.0 17195.6 1364.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7042.4 1660.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 920.5 1534.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1231327.1 820.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1202.0 [code]
Posted by 2hourservers, 02-23-2011, 03:16 PM
x3220 8GB ram
Posted by Microlinux, 02-25-2011, 01:03 AM
Phenom II X6 1055T x 12GB
Posted by FiberFy, 02-27-2011, 02:24 AM
It would be cool if you could get us a simple line for apt-get and yum with all the required programs to run this test, so we could all run it in our newly acquired vps/dedicated Thank you for this.
Posted by FiberFy, 02-27-2011, 06:32 PM
HostRail 1Power Unit VPS running in openvz: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: celcius: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab079.2 -- #1 SMP Fri Dec 17 19:25:15 MSK 2010 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz (5999.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz (5999.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz (5999.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz (5999.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 19:34:58 up 3:55, 1 user, load average: 0.33, 0.08, 0.04; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 27 2011 19:34:59 - 21:40:28 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1325580.4 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2510.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 349.0 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 42206.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 12468.6 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 88643.8 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 81262.8 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 16747.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1162.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 451.2 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 56.5 lpm (62.2 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 73718.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 1325580.4 113.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2510.4 456.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 349.0 81.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 42206.9 106.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 12468.6 75.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 88643.8 152.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 81262.8 65.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16747.2 41.9 Process Creation 126.0 1162.6 92.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 451.2 106.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 56.5 94.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 73718.2 49.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 96.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 27 2011 21:40:28 - 01:19:34 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1322568.3 lps (10.4 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9205.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 391.4 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 81160.9 KBps (32.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 28941.6 KBps (30.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 164220.1 KBps (30.5 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 84850.9 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 28092.4 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1135.3 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 453.5 lpm (60.5 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 66.1 lpm (61.7 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 72542.6 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 1322568.3 113.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9205.0 1673.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 391.4 91.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 81160.9 205.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 28941.6 174.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 164220.1 283.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 84850.9 68.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 28092.4 70.2 Process Creation 126.0 1135.3 90.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 453.5 106.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 66.1 110.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 72542.6 48.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 136.8 Yeah, really bad.
Posted by FiberFy, 02-27-2011, 06:32 PM
WebAngel.ie Starter VPS, with only 1 core, running xen: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: mx.xen35.hosting2.webangel.ie: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 -- #1 SMP Tue Jan 25 06:13:50 UTC 2011 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (5349.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 21:42:43 up 0 min, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 27 2011 21:42:43 - 22:10:55 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20121927.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3173.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1929.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 261593.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 67932.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 876302.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 392511.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 107117.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4269.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4724.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 629.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 473097.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20121927.4 1724.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3173.3 577.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 1929.6 448.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 261593.0 660.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 67932.9 410.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 876302.0 1510.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 392511.2 315.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 107117.0 267.8 Process Creation 126.0 4269.7 338.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4724.7 1114.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 629.0 1048.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 473097.8 315.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 594.0 This one is faaaaaaast
Posted by xtremecoders, 03-04-2011, 05:02 PM
Here is mine.... AMD 4600+ (dualcore) with 2GB DDR.. The Next Monday moving on new Server... AMD ATHLON II (QuadCore) 4X3.0 GHz with 8GB DDR3
Posted by 2hourservers, 03-06-2011, 12:25 AM
Intel xeon 3426 No raid 8GB ram
Posted by YUPAPA, 03-06-2011, 04:02 AM

Posted by GASB, 03-07-2011, 08:47 AM
Intel Xeon X3440 4x (2x 2.9GHz) 8GB DDR3 Disk IO test disabled more tests later
Posted by GASB, 03-07-2011, 07:03 PM
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.33 Ghz, 2 GB DDR2, IO test disabled Last edited by GASB; 03-07-2011 at 07:12 PM.
Posted by GASB, 03-07-2011, 08:20 PM
Intel Xeon X3430 4x 2.8GHz 8GB DDR3, IO test disabled
Posted by GASB, 03-07-2011, 09:17 PM
Intel Celeron 2.66Ghz, 2 GB RAM, IO test disabled
Posted by GASB, 03-07-2011, 11:17 PM
Athlon 64 X2 4400+, 2 GB DDR2, IO test disabled
Posted by hosting-squared, 03-08-2011, 06:15 AM
Server4You Proserver Power Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX100 Server Intel® Xeon® X3440 Quadcore 64 Bit, 4x 2.53 GHz 8 GB DDR3-RAM 2x 1,000 GB SATA II-HDD
Posted by bhavicp, 03-11-2011, 04:34 PM
A Xeon X3450 w 8GB RAM - IO test disabled
Posted by ghostape, 03-21-2011, 03:01 PM
VPS 2 768m ram-knownhost ca: VPS linode 1024m ram: So should i use vps knownhost? Last edited by ghostape; 03-21-2011 at 03:16 PM.
Posted by DmitrijCSR, 03-22-2011, 10:00 AM
Volumedrive VPS Package 1. I have to say 3/4 tests have failed with such errors, might be a sign of oversold ram?
Posted by quadix, 03-22-2011, 01:36 PM
We just need to increase your kmemsize. Please contact support and we'll be glad to assist.
Posted by DmitrijCSR, 03-22-2011, 03:36 PM
Thank you for pointing to the right direction, I forgot about checking beancounters and this limit does seem lower then I got used to. So I take my words back about overselling as it's not the case
Posted by micze, 03-25-2011, 04:37 PM
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: meow: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Mon Mar 7 21:35:22 UTC 2011 Machine: x86_64 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6148.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 20:39:07 up 4:37, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 25 2011 20:39:07 - 21:03:17 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30992775.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4001.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2364.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2726759.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 106550.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10085.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5249.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 2481.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4371.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4598108.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30992775.2 2655.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4001.1 727.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2364.4 549.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2726759.5 2191.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 106550.7 266.4 Process Creation 126.0 10085.1 800.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5249.4 1238.1 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 2481.7 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4371.3 7285.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4598108.2 3065.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 1337.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 25 2011 21:03:17 - 21:27:32 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 135283651.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 26004.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 29166.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 12374259.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2617741.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 85710.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42586.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 2775.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5557.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 13883881.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 135283651.8 11592.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 26004.1 4728.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 29166.2 6782.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12374259.8 9947.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2617741.8 6544.4 Process Creation 126.0 85710.2 6802.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 42586.6 10044.0 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 2775.3 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5557.8 9263.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 13883881.0 9255.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 8048.8
Posted by 2009plus, 03-26-2011, 10:34 AM
What hosting company are you using?
Posted by kaizen1911, 03-26-2011, 09:39 PM
i5-2500 (4x3.3Ghz) - 8GB DDR3 - 1000GB SATA2 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: i2037.userdns.net: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.el5 -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 17:38:34 up 2:21, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.07, 0.02; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 26 2011 17:38:34 - 18:06:40 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21264233.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3568.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4453.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 860947.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 240055.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2148265.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1501179.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 163266.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 10977.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5449.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2873.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1242528.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21264233.3 1822.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3568.1 648.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4453.4 1035.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 860947.4 2174.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 240055.3 1450.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2148265.1 3703.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1501179.8 1206.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 163266.6 408.2 Process Creation 126.0 10977.7 871.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5449.4 1285.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2873.9 4789.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1242528.0 828.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1332.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 26 2011 18:06:40 - 18:34:48 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 85083224.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14184.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 26591.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 312622.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 85398.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 910630.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5975044.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1897415.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 86684.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 35018.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4851.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4500889.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 85083224.2 7290.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14184.8 2579.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 26591.4 6184.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 312622.2 789.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 85398.9 516.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 910630.9 1570.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5975044.8 4803.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1897415.9 4743.5 Process Creation 126.0 86684.1 6879.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 35018.3 8259.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4851.2 8085.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4500889.8 3000.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3393.9
Posted by kaizen1911, 03-26-2011, 10:34 PM
With Disk IO Disabled: ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: i2037.userdns.net: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.el5 -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 2 14:58:14 EDT 2010 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (6584.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 18:45:00 up 3:28, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 1.61, 3.83; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 26 2011 18:45:00 - 19:09:03 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21272049.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3529.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4400.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1501689.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 181902.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12035.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5493.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1811.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2881.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1241850.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21272049.5 1822.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3529.6 641.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4400.0 1023.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1501689.9 1207.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 181902.7 454.8 Process Creation 126.0 12035.4 955.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5493.8 1295.7 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1811.6 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2881.0 4801.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1241850.3 827.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 1139.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 26 2011 19:09:03 - 19:33:07 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 85050361.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 14272.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 26585.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5981774.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1900914.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 85899.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 34946.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 2441.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4847.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4495452.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 85050361.1 7287.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14272.2 2595.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 26585.0 6182.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5981774.7 4808.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1900914.2 4752.3 Process Creation 126.0 85899.2 6817.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 34946.7 8242.1 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 2441.7 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4847.5 8079.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4495452.1 2997.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 5357.3
Posted by david3, 03-27-2011, 06:18 AM
Kazila VPS (Plano, TX) 512 MB RAM, 1 GB Swap Xen CentOS 5.5 (32 bit)
Posted by micze, 03-27-2011, 11:17 AM
I am using Hetzner
Posted by klamas, 03-28-2011, 12:52 AM
Hetzner vServer VQ 7 CPU - Single Core RAM - 512 MB CentOS 5.5
Posted by Gary4gar, 04-05-2011, 07:56 AM
Thrustvps, 512MB RAM
Posted by sam2kb, 04-06-2011, 06:13 PM
Datashack - Xeon 5150 2.66, 4GB, 500GB
Posted by praboy, 04-07-2011, 12:42 AM
Burst.net 1GB Miami
Posted by TheEagle, 04-10-2011, 07:14 AM
INTO VPS 1GB OpenVZ (Netherlands)
Posted by HostXNow_Chris, 04-10-2011, 09:28 AM
Dell PowerEdge Quad Core Xeon Processor X3430, (4x2.4 GHz), 4 GB memory, 2x300 GB SAS 15k rpm Hard Drive (RAID 1) no Disk I/O test:
Posted by djs596, 04-10-2011, 05:31 PM
AMD Opteron 1354 quad core - 6GB RAM (no disk test)
Posted by kaizen1911, 04-12-2011, 11:17 PM
VPS - Debian 6 x64 - 1x3.3Ghz (i5-2500K) - 4GB Dedicated Ram - Hyper-V Disk-IO Disabled
Posted by frankiee, 04-15-2011, 12:25 AM
Xeon 3460, 8GB DDR3, 2x80GB Intel X25-M SSD in RAID-1 with IOFlood in PhoenixNAP System Benchmarks Index Score 4463.7
Posted by frankiee, 04-15-2011, 12:28 AM
Sorry that I didn't put both in one reply.. tmzvps.com TMZ-3072 - 3GB Ram System Benchmarks Index Score 2353.4
Posted by dreamnetua, 04-15-2011, 09:06 AM
AMD Phenom X6 1035T 2.6 / 4 RAM / 2x640 HDD SATA III
Posted by Servax, 04-16-2011, 11:42 PM
All tests enabled on a SuperMicro Intel Xeon E3 1240, 8 GB Memory.
Posted by Hazzi, 04-18-2011, 03:45 AM
VolumeDrive Intel Xeon X3450 2.66 Ghz (8 logical cores) 8 GB DDR3 ECC 1333 Memory 250 GB SATA Hard Drive 250 GB SATA Hard Drive 2 IP Addresses 100 MBPS Unmetered Bandwidth Per Month: $49.95 No RAID
Posted by djs596, 04-19-2011, 06:09 PM
Core i3 550 - 6GB RAM (disk test disabled)
Posted by v3locityx, 04-21-2011, 03:45 AM
Datashack AMD Phenom x4 965 - 8GB RAM
Posted by observerss, 04-21-2011, 06:52 AM
i7-2600 3.4 Ghz, 8G DDR3
Posted by Same11, 04-22-2011, 03:17 AM
VolumeDrive VPS : 2 GB RAM Dedicated Last edited by Same11; 04-22-2011 at 03:27 AM.
Posted by Same11, 04-22-2011, 03:22 AM
Semoweb VPS 256 MB Dedicated RAM , 768 Burstable RAM
Posted by Same11, 04-22-2011, 03:28 AM
DataShack : AMD X4 840 2 GB RAM 500 GB HDD
Posted by Microlinux, 04-22-2011, 09:48 PM
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 16GB RAM
Posted by xtremecoders, 04-23-2011, 06:24 AM
i7 920 with 8GB ram on Hetzner online AG....
Posted by raindog308, 04-23-2011, 02:42 PM
I ran unixbench (wht version) on a couple providers...I'm planning to move all my linode stuff to 6sync after a month of trying each. linode is really great but 6sync is faster and more generous. Overall, both providers have been excellent but I was curious what a benchmark between them would be. Love to see some other benchmarks. And yes, I realize the best benchmark is "does the whole provider experience give me what I need" - just for fun/comparison/curiosity. (sorry, I couldn't get this as nicely formatted in bbcode as I would have liked) linode 512MB VPS (Xen) running Debian 6 (hostname removed) 6sync 512MB VPS (KVM) running CentOS 5.6 (hostname removed)
Posted by MXV-CPence, 04-23-2011, 05:36 PM
=I guess it's not that bad for a XenServer VPS with like 10 nodes.
Posted by Kevin K, 04-23-2011, 09:12 PM
512MB Xen KVM 6sync VPS on Centos 5.6
Posted by DmitrijCSR, 04-24-2011, 10:27 AM
Test VPS from Hetzner VQ7 512MB RAM 1CPU i7 Feels blazing fast.
Posted by Madsn, 04-24-2011, 11:54 AM
Virpus budget 512mb #./Run Result 1618.5 #./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 result 1920.4
Posted by VDSDC, 04-24-2011, 01:56 PM
VPS w/512MB Memory - 8 Cores - Centos 5.6 32 Bit BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: srv01.vdsdc.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Tue Apr 12 18:10:56 EDT 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4266.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4267.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4266.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4265.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 4: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4266.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 5: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4262.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 6: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4266.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 7: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (4266.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET 16:48:45 up 18:28, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 23 2011 16:48:45 - 17:16:41 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9933276.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1934.8 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2954.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 455772.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 129081.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1136009.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 897969.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 33202.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16333.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6166.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2829.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 905741.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9933276.1 851.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1934.8 351.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2954.2 687.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 455772.1 1150.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 129081.9 780.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1136009.6 1958.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 897969.1 721.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 33202.9 83.0 Process Creation 126.0 16333.5 1296.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6166.1 1454.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2829.9 4716.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 905741.5 603.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 835.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 23 2011 17:16:41 - 17:44:40 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 78613993.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 15260.8 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 25009.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 176171.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 49645.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 463082.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 7090675.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2005502.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 94624.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 30477.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4513.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4989771.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 78613993.3 6736.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15260.8 2774.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 25009.8 5816.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 176171.3 444.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 49645.5 300.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 463082.0 798.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7090675.1 5699.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2005502.5 5013.8 Process Creation 126.0 94624.9 7509.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 30477.5 7188.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4513.3 7522.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4989771.2 3326.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2957.1
Posted by Preetam, 04-24-2011, 03:51 PM
Xeon E3-1230 (Sandy Bridge) 16.0 GB DDR3 ECC
Posted by rhenderson, 04-25-2011, 10:51 PM
make: *** [pgms/ubgears] Error 1 ?? Is that what you are getting? Try installing libXext-devel
Posted by SeedBit, 04-27-2011, 09:01 AM
New Linode 512 in Texas running CentOS. Disk i/o enabled.
Posted by resellertr, 04-27-2011, 12:44 PM
Intel I7 2600 8 GB DDRII 1 X 256 GB SATA3 Corsair SSD 1 X 200 GB Corsair F240 SSD Cent OS 5.6 64 Bit ( Custom Kernel )
Posted by toasty2, 05-01-2011, 05:51 PM
Yisp.nl VPS 512MB: I'm just now switching to this VPS. While I migrate I have my old one from them still on their old service (same package), and I'm somewhat bummed to find out my old one is actually much faster: Perhaps it's because other customers switched to the new service like I am and thus the server is under less load.
Posted by DaFrog, 05-03-2011, 06:15 PM
Meebox.net - Virtual Cloud Server. (Free Demo - Check website on how to get that) Base Image: Debian 6.0 64bit - 20GB Processors: 1 Memory: 512MB Disks: 20GB Without I/O. (./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16) Last edited by DaFrog; 05-03-2011 at 06:26 PM.
Posted by DaFrog, 05-03-2011, 06:49 PM
Without I/O. (./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16) sorry seems theres more activity on the node at test without I/O
Posted by mitgib, 05-04-2011, 05:01 PM
AMD x6 1090T 16gb ECC 3ware 9650 w/BBU Tyan S8005 ./Run
Posted by TinyVox, 05-04-2011, 07:06 PM
anyone experiencing ssh closing while doing an fs test via unixbench?
Posted by TinyVox, 05-04-2011, 08:23 PM
nm. It's was csf.
Posted by ClearOranges Network, 05-05-2011, 09:29 AM
Datashack - AMD Phenom II X4 965 (3.4 GHz, 8GB RAM DDR3)
Posted by procrastinator, 05-08-2011, 10:48 AM
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T
Posted by George_Fusioned, 05-12-2011, 10:31 AM
EcoVPS Safari w/ CentOS 5 (Virtuozzo, 1GB guaranteed RAM)
Posted by George_Fusioned, 05-12-2011, 10:58 AM
clustered.net VPS25 Unmanaged (2GB Dedicated RAM)
Posted by George_Fusioned, 05-12-2011, 12:28 PM
1-node VPS.NET server w/ CentOS5 (600MHz CPU, 376MB RAM)
Posted by George_Fusioned, 05-12-2011, 03:19 PM
clustered.net VPS70 Unmanaged (12 cores, 3.0GHz guaranteed CPU, 4GB guaranteed RAM)
Posted by George_Fusioned, 05-12-2011, 06:00 PM
Dell SC1425 dedicated server (2x Intel Xeon 3.2GHz, 2GB RAM)
Posted by Master Server, 05-22-2011, 10:15 PM
Hmmmm... I ran "Make" and this is what i got: I'm trying to change VPS providers and see which is better. Would this be a good way to compare it? How about bandwidth speed comparison? Thanks.
Posted by Cyclon, 05-23-2011, 04:53 AM
You need to install gcc... # yum install gcc
Posted by Master Server, 05-23-2011, 07:44 AM
Hohoho. Now it's giving me: Pardon my noobisity.
Posted by HUGOBLUE, 05-23-2011, 07:50 AM
Try read the makefile Disable the graphic tests and try again ?
Posted by zhenglei, 05-28-2011, 12:51 AM
Benchmarks with DISK IO: Rssult: 591.4 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: vps.xxxxxx.net: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-305-ec2 -- #9-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 15 04:14:01 UTC 2010 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (4802.0 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 23:51:42 up 4 days, 17:52, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.45, 0.55; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri May 27 2011 23:51:42 - 00:19:41 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13070648.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2337.0 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1895.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 455993.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 116549.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1091535.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 671284.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 86750.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3755.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3035.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 353.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 581924.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13070648.6 1120.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2337.0 424.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 1895.9 440.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 455993.4 1151.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 116549.9 704.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1091535.5 1882.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 671284.9 539.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 86750.3 216.9 Process Creation 126.0 3755.8 298.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3035.7 716.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 353.7 589.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 581924.7 387.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 591.4
Posted by durbz, 05-29-2011, 07:02 PM
yum install libXext-devel
Posted by dreamnetua, 05-31-2011, 06:24 AM
Sever rent Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G840 @ 2.80GHz /2gb RAM/2xHDD SATA3 - 62$
Posted by Orien, 06-02-2011, 03:01 AM
2.5GB Cloud with disk tests enabled. Last edited by Orien; 06-02-2011 at 03:11 AM.
Posted by abat, 06-02-2011, 04:18 PM
Cheap Kimsufi
Posted by FiFtHeLeMeNt, 06-02-2011, 06:16 PM
Kimsufi 24G
Posted by djs596, 06-02-2011, 06:58 PM
Atom D525 test box
Posted by mojojuju, 06-06-2011, 01:00 AM
VirtuallyDedicated.net OpenVZ based "hybrid cloud server" 4-CPU 2.5 GB RAM
Posted by AdelaideHost, 06-07-2011, 09:44 AM
i7 with 12GB RAM. Can't wait to finish configuring it and actually play with it.
Posted by zhenglei, 06-19-2011, 04:57 AM
# 128MB guaranteed/256MB burstable memory # 10GB storage # 300GB/month data transfer # OpenVZ/SolusVM # 1 IP in Kansas City The result of UnixBench 5.1.2: 1238.1 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: Localhost: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.028stab091.1 -- #1 SMP Wed Jun 1 13:20:2 5 MSD 2011 Machine: i686 (unknown) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor (6209.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor (6401.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 09:49:14 up 1:37, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 19 2011 09:49:14 - 10:17:15 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 14247935.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2522.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2891.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 666914.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 212719.0 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 935761.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1546190.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 291698.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7359.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4071.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 591.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1473204.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 14247935.3 1220.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2522.3 458.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 2891.6 672.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 666914.8 1684.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 212719.0 1285.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 935761.0 1613.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1546190.6 1242.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 291698.3 729.2 Process Creation 126.0 7359.3 584.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4071.1 960.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 591.7 986.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1473204.0 982.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 964.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 19 2011 10:17:15 - 10:45:29 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28325265.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5068.7 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4946.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 277714.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 103640.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 409976.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2998921.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 574050.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 13024.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7667.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1012.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2233174.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28325265.0 2427.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5068.7 921.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 4946.4 1150.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 277714.0 701.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 103640.2 626.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 409976.7 706.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2998921.2 2410.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 574050.8 1435.1 Process Creation 126.0 13024.9 1033.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7667.9 1808.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1012.3 1687.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2233174.8 1488.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1238.1
Posted by WWS2010, 06-21-2011, 04:58 PM
BuyVM $15/year VPS tested with disk i/o tests disabled Last edited by WWS2010; 06-21-2011 at 05:03 PM.
Posted by MannDude, 06-25-2011, 01:45 AM
Just deployed a new node so decided to run UnixBench on a 512MB VM with 50% CPU priority (4 cores). VM has a basic LAMP stack, no actual use.
Posted by newhostro, 06-28-2011, 11:43 AM
newHOST.ro's Expert Enterprise:
Posted by strat, 06-28-2011, 12:58 PM
Dual E5620 + 8GB Ram 2 x WD RE4 software raid 0 1 x Intel 320 SSD for CentOS
Posted by WWS2010, 07-01-2011, 02:05 PM
Hetzner EQ4: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 01 2011 19:06:03 - 19:35:08 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17759300.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3512.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4566.5 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1005778.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 290336.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1919892.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2603303.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 245378.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 18087.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8977.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3584.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4321093.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17759300.8 1521.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3512.1 638.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 4566.5 1062.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1005778.9 2539.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 290336.2 1754.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1919892.8 3310.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2603303.3 2092.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 245378.5 613.4 Process Creation 126.0 18087.0 1435.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8977.8 2117.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3584.2 5973.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4321093.7 2880.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1781.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 01 2011 19:35:08 - 20:04:23 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 67362574.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 22786.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 31589.2 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 535999.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 147744.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1611162.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 11512187.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2513509.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 84025.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42247.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5472.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 14552558.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 67362574.4 5772.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 22786.8 4143.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 31589.2 7346.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 535999.5 1353.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 147744.9 892.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1611162.2 2777.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 11512187.1 9254.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2513509.5 6283.8 Process Creation 126.0 84025.6 6668.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 42247.9 9964.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5472.4 9120.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 14552558.8 9701.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 4920.9
Posted by SaaSMX, 07-09-2011, 02:19 PM
On Terremark's vCloudExpress 512MB RAM Server with 1 core:
Posted by webcho, 07-10-2011, 04:20 PM
Cloud hosting: AMAZON EC2, image: AMI ID ami-ccb35ea5, m1.large (4 ECU, 2 Cores, 7.5 GB RAM) Last edited by webcho; 07-10-2011 at 04:26 PM. Reason: (edit)
Posted by webcho, 07-10-2011, 04:28 PM
Dedicated server @codero.com: Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz, 2 cores; 512 MB RAM, CentOS 5.5, 100 GB hdd
Posted by XDF4u, 07-26-2011, 05:22 PM
Hetzner VQ 19 VPS Single Core 2 GB RAM 80 GB HD on some sort of RAID no backup space 4 TB traffic/mo http://www.hetzner.de/ Debian 6.0 64 bit Tests run 2011-07-26 UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 the best of three subsequent test runs of dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync the best of three subsequent test runs of hdparm -t Disclaimer: based on my experience disk performance testing with dd and hdparm are crude methods. The real-life disk load of a web service cannot be emulated with dd or hdparm.
Posted by XDF4u, 07-26-2011, 05:25 PM
Hetzner EQ 4 Dedicated Server i7-920 Quadcore 8 GB RAM 750 GB HD RAID1 100 GB backup space 10 TB traffic/mo http://www.hetzner.de/ Debian 6.0 64 bit Tests run 2011-07-26 UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 the best of three subsequent test runs of dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync the best of three subsequent test runs of hdparm -t Disclaimer: based on my experience disk performance testing with dd and hdparm are crude methods. The real-life disk load of a web service cannot be emulated with dd or hdparm.
Posted by XDF4u, 07-26-2011, 05:30 PM
Xencon x|pro 512 VPS Dual CPU 0.5 GB RAM 40 GB HD (RAID 1/RAID 10) with automated backups 0.5 TB traffic/mo http://www.xencon.net/ Debian 6.0 64 bit Tests run 2011-07-26 UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 the best of three subsequent test runs of dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync the best of three subsequent test runs of hdparm -t Disclaimer: based on my experience disk performance testing with dd and hdparm are crude methods. The real-life disk load of a web service cannot be emulated with dd or hdparm.
Posted by jmcastoldi, 08-02-2011, 12:25 PM
Flex'Server 3 @ ikoula.com 2 CPU 1 GB Ram 40 GB hdd unmetered Debian 6.0 64 bit 15 / month UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 the best of three subsequent test runs of dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync the best of three subsequent test runs of hdparm -t /dev/sda1
Posted by jmcastoldi, 08-03-2011, 07:39 AM
Cloud Server @ cloudsigma.com 1 CPU 2 GB Ram 10 GB hdd unmetered Debian 6.0 64 bit UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 the best of three subsequent test runs of dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync the best of three subsequent test runs of hdparm -t /dev/sda1
Posted by kafloofen, 08-10-2011, 01:18 AM
QuickWeb SSD VZ2 - 1GB
Posted by kafloofen, 08-10-2011, 02:51 AM
Linode 512MB
Posted by kafloofen, 08-10-2011, 06:22 AM
Quickweb's LA Xen Pro 1024MB
Posted by kafloofen, 08-12-2011, 07:00 AM
6sync Plan Mega 1.5GB
Posted by kafloofen, 08-12-2011, 08:52 AM
WebNX i7 860, 8gb ram, 1x 1tb hdd
Posted by LinuXice, 08-14-2011, 09:41 AM
KnownHost VS4 Dallas 1280 MB RAM ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by kafloofen, 08-23-2011, 11:33 PM
Kiloserve XENPV 2GB RAM Last edited by kafloofen; 08-23-2011 at 11:40 PM.
Posted by NeiPCs, 08-26-2011, 03:24 AM
Xeon E3-1230 Sandy Bridge, 8GB of RAM
Posted by kafloofen, 08-26-2011, 06:16 AM
WebNX i7 8GB RAM disk I/O test disabled
Posted by rewtguy, 08-26-2011, 09:29 PM
not sure what all that means, but it's a dell power edge 1950 that i managed to scoop up for around 340 USD
Posted by backtogeek, 08-27-2011, 01:25 PM
Our XEN PV - 96mb package without disk IO tests:
Posted by minhmeo, 08-27-2011, 02:15 PM
KVM 256MB Ram, 2 Cores Cpu
Posted by Mateuss, 08-28-2011, 07:44 AM
Hetzner Root Server X4 Server4you EcoServer LARGE
Posted by cmimrie, 09-01-2011, 06:54 PM
Provider: Yisp.NL Package: Cloud VPS 256 Last edited by cmimrie; 09-01-2011 at 06:58 PM.
Posted by cmimrie, 09-01-2011, 07:18 PM
Provider: 6sync Package: Mini
Posted by BurakUeda, 09-03-2011, 05:17 AM
Ubiquity Servers Xeon X3460 w/HT 4GB RAM
Posted by MannDude, 09-05-2011, 05:20 AM
Heh', this is my personal developmental/playground Xen VPS on one of our full nodes with 256MB RAM and 2 CPUs assigned to it. This is with CentOS 5.x, Nginx, PHP-fpm, MySQL, MemCached & CSF running a mostly static site with a non-public facing Wordpress blog.
Posted by MMrs, 09-13-2011, 05:42 PM

Posted by benNICHOLAS, 09-15-2011, 09:04 AM
Hetzner EQ7
Posted by Hetzner_Online, 09-15-2011, 06:18 PM
we do not offer a EQ7 Maybe it was our EQ6 or EQ8.
Posted by CSCenter, 09-19-2011, 01:44 PM

Posted by benNICHOLAS, 09-19-2011, 05:01 PM
Sorry, It's an EQ9!
Posted by ckissi, 09-22-2011, 06:13 PM
2 x E5620, 24GB RAM, 4 x 146 15k RAID10
Posted by Herenow, 09-27-2011, 10:09 PM
LoveVps Custom Server 2gb Ram / 1 Cpu (OpenVz)
Posted by XDF4u, 10-04-2011, 12:46 PM
Hetzner EX 4 Dedicated Server Intel Core i7-2600 Quadcore 16 GB DDR3 RAM 2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD http://www.hetzner.de/ Tests run 2011-10-04 on Debian 6.0 minimal 64 bit UnixBench 5.1.2 ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by Mateuss, 10-04-2011, 02:47 PM
Root Server EX 4 Intel® Core i7-2600 Quad-Core 16 GB DDR3 RAM 2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD Seagate Barracuda XT ST 33000651 AS http://www.hetzner.de/hosting/produkte_rootserver/ex4
Posted by TonyB, 10-04-2011, 06:06 PM
I attempted to run this on a Dual E5-2650 and unixbench wanted no part of the 32 CPU and just doesn't run it. Full Specs: Dual Xeon E5-2650 [2GHz] (8 cores and 16 threads per CPU) 24GB RAM Adaptec 5405z 4x600GB (ST3600057SS) 15K RPM Raid-10 Here's the single CPU test for anyone curious: With ./Run:
Posted by tim874536, 10-09-2011, 01:29 PM
Dell R310, X3430 @ 2.4G (4C4T) 4G ram Run without harddisk (command #2)
Posted by RavC, 10-12-2011, 05:53 AM
Curious, how or where did you get those chips? I thought they weren't available for a few months yet
Posted by Preetam, 10-12-2011, 10:01 AM
I think SoftLayer has them for some reason...
Posted by NelsonT, 10-12-2011, 10:06 AM
China biggest online store taobao selling E5-2650/RMB 8000, E5-2665/RMB 10500, E5-2687W/RMB 18000.
Posted by TonyB, 10-12-2011, 12:23 PM
That's right SoftLayer has them in Singapore right now but you can't order them on their site as of yet. I assume this situation is similar to others in newer datacenters. When you order some hardware they don't actually stock it so you get something higher end or similar. For example if you order a X5670 in some datacenters it may actually be a X5675. So these CPU's are substitutes for some of the higher end hardware which they don't actually have in Singapore. It makes sense why stock up on 5600 series CPU's when in 3 months people will be wanting these CPU's anyways. My understanding is SoftLayer has a deal with Intel and a few others about getting some of the newer hardware. This situation has come up before with some of the new CPU's. SoftLayer has had CPU's available on their site before a lot of server builders had them on their site for people to buy. Last edited by TonyB; 10-12-2011 at 12:27 PM.
Posted by RavC, 10-12-2011, 04:48 PM
Why am I not surprised Actually I remember with the launch of Conroe (the start of the Intel's current dominant architecture) a Taiwanese friend gave me an engineering sample CPU several months before it was officially launched
Posted by RavC, 10-12-2011, 04:51 PM
Thanks for the explanation. It completely makes sense from a business perspective and stock inventory. But I would have thought Softlayer (being a US organisation) would probably be under some sort of NDA if they had early access or general availability restrictions for resale.. but maybe that's just a perk of business once you're "big"
Posted by lab4games, 10-15-2011, 02:58 AM
Dell R510 E5620 12GB Ram
Posted by MannDude, 10-18-2011, 02:32 AM
That's an active VPS from Spechosting with 1.5GB RAM, cPanel, and 5 or 6 low traffic sites. Meets my expectations.
Posted by cubemedia, 11-02-2011, 09:21 AM
Supermicro E3-1230 16GB RAM RAID10
Posted by dolphinaura, 11-16-2011, 06:27 PM
AlienVPS UFO4.
Posted by enforcer11, 12-07-2011, 02:12 PM
Don't Know how to get the word out Melbourneit.com host scam websites, got ripped off and no one care or wants to help!!!! rip of site ip 173.199.133.28
Posted by ICC-USA, 12-07-2011, 03:04 PM
If they will resell it to you - you will sign the NDA too. No special perks Those CPUs are available long time ago for the big guys and for the guys who work with big guys It's not true that softlayer got those it before builders
Posted by NE-Andy, 12-07-2011, 06:54 PM
Here's my results of my dedicated server at DataShack.net. I must say, I'm pretty happy with the results... even though it probably doesn't know what its talking about (E5440 doesn't have Hyper Threading, yet it says it is) The server was picked up here on WHT: http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1093076 Xeon 5150 upgraded to dual E5440 CPU and 8GB RAM. Last edited by NE-Andy; 12-07-2011 at 06:58 PM.
Posted by xsnomad, 12-08-2011, 10:06 AM
but this was under dedicated server, is a VM still considered a dedicated server?
Posted by djs596, 12-16-2011, 03:59 PM
No, because a VM is a virtual machine on a host node (server). There are other VMs on the node using resources, and so the machine isn't dedicated to you. I suppose it could be argued that a VM that is the only VM on a node could be considered dedicated as you'd technically have access to the full resources (if it was set up that way).
Posted by djs596, 12-16-2011, 04:00 PM
AMD Athlon II X3 450 - 4GB RAM (no disk test)
Posted by JohnTheRipper, 12-21-2011, 11:40 AM
Cheap hostcat dedi I recently picked up. Last edited by JohnTheRipper; 12-21-2011 at 11:47 AM. Reason: Fixed formatting.
Posted by visichat, 12-24-2011, 06:01 AM
so much informative for me this
Posted by aww, 01-01-2012, 10:56 AM
Kazila KVPS-5 XenPV (3.4) - container running CentOS 6.2 x86_64 w/cpanel 4 core access | 1512 MB | 50 GB | ~$56/mo node has 15k-rpm raid10 (dual Intel, 8 core total cpu, I think) (comments welcome as I am evaluating this host) Cpanel installed but httpd and mysqld were stopped for tests. Disk is wicked, wicked fast (discarding tests over 400 as they might be almost entirely in cache) summaryfull output
Posted by Kurikami, 01-04-2012, 10:16 AM
2Ghz (1 cpu AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128), 128-256 Ram/Swap, VMWare VPS from http://dreamservers.uk.com/.
Posted by RACKSET, 01-09-2012, 09:56 PM
dedicated 2x xeon E5345 16gb ram 2x73gb raid 1 Last edited by RACKSET; 01-09-2012 at 10:01 PM.
Posted by RACKSET, 01-09-2012, 10:04 PM
Intel i7-3930 cpu, Sandy Bridge-E 6 cores at 3.2ghz (shows up as 12 cores with HT) 16gb ram / 1x 120gb intel 320 series ssd A deployed cpanel server without any host on it, yet. Last edited by RACKSET; 01-09-2012 at 10:07 PM.
Posted by RACKSET, 01-09-2012, 10:36 PM
xen vm on E3 1270 4GB RAM 8 core raid 10 (4x 1TB FBYX) new installed server with no other vm on it. Sounds interesting!
Posted by Host Ultra, 01-10-2012, 02:14 AM
OVH HG server with 12 300GB Intel SSD's in hardware raid 6 (I haven't checked if the partitions are aligned or done any optimizations). Raid controller is MegaRAID SAS 2108. # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.06184 s, 521 MB/s # dd if=test of=/dev/null bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync dd: fsync failed for `/dev/null': Invalid argument 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 0.159154 s, 6.7 GB/s
Posted by eva2000, 01-12-2012, 11:18 AM
Core i7 3930K 8GB DDR3 4x60GB SSD raid CentOS 6.2 64bit If you include disk benchmarks
Posted by Host Pug, 01-15-2012, 11:00 PM
Awesome speed , what is the SSD HDD Brand? and the raid controller?
Posted by Host Ultra, 01-15-2012, 11:09 PM
I have found that to get the correct read speed you have to add iflag=direct to the dd command. Otherwise your just reading from the OS RAM cache, especially if you run the read test directly after the write test. So all these tests that are using conv=fdatasync on the read test are invalid.
Posted by mtwiscool, 01-22-2012, 04:23 PM
virtualsrv: 1gb ram openvz vps # # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: server1.0poundhosting.tk: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.028stab094.3 -- #1 SMP Thu Sep 22 13:24:07 MSD 2011 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ (6027.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET 22:33:23 up 4 days, 1:18, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 0.35, 0.22; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Jan 22 2012 22:33:23 - 23:00:39 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9343764.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2441.1 MWIPS (4.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2718.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 325770.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 98903.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 729637.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 894139.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 207875.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7389.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2911.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 374.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2355099.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9343764.4 800.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2441.1 443.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2718.5 632.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 325770.4 822.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 98903.5 597.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 729637.4 1258.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 894139.8 718.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 207875.0 519.7 Process Creation 126.0 7389.3 586.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2911.9 686.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 374.6 624.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2355099.4 1570.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 723.3
Posted by JohnTheRipper, 01-24-2012, 02:27 AM
DediDirect dual L5420 with 8GB RAM. Much better than my previous dedi (http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showpo...&postcount=470).
Posted by XLHost, 01-24-2012, 10:03 AM
I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet because this thread is a total beast but there is a new version of UnixBench out 5.1.3 which handles concurrent threads better than 5.1.2 and if you have more than 16 cores/threads you have to modify the 'Run' script to use the additional threads: I had to modify the above in order to get UnixBench to use all 64 cores/threads in our 4x6274 server. thanks
Posted by XDF4u, 01-30-2012, 07:22 PM
Hetzner VQ 12 VPS Single Core1 GB RAM40 GB HD on some sort of RAIDno backup space2 TB traffic/mohttp://www.hetzner.de/Tests run 2012-01-31 on Debian 6.0 64 bit the best of three subsequent test runs of 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.39155 s, 128 MB/s (this must be a some sort of peak , the other two were around 70 MB/s) the best of three subsequent test runs of Timing buffered disk reads: 858 MB in 3.00 seconds = 285.75 MB/sec Disclaimer: based on my experience disk performance testing with dd and hdparm are crude methods. The real-life disk load of a web service cannot be emulated with dd or hdparm.
Posted by ivytony, 01-30-2012, 07:42 PM
On my CentOS 6.2 VPS server, I got this below error when running "make" with this benmark script: how to fix it? thanks
Posted by Echizen, 02-03-2012, 03:17 PM
DS from SecuredServers, dual xeon e5620 I use 4x500GB SATA II, hardware raid-10 LSI 9260-4i card DD test Hdparm is it normal?
Posted by dewaforex, 02-16-2012, 11:31 PM
Inter Atom 1GB RAM
Posted by dreamnetua, 02-24-2012, 06:48 AM
New Intel Atom D2700 2.13Ghz/2Gb Ram/2x250HDD FC15
Posted by tianpu, 02-27-2012, 08:02 AM
hetzner ex5 Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:22:28 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Posted by BonsaiRack, 03-01-2012, 09:55 PM
nevermind got it to work with the following: yum install mesa-libGL-devel libXext-devel Last edited by BonsaiRack; 03-01-2012 at 10:03 PM.
Posted by CSCenter, 03-02-2012, 11:04 AM
WiredTree hybrid vps (Virtuozzo): Spec: 1 CPU core on a dual quad core E5410 @ 2.33Ghz (Although strangely, everything seems to detect all 8 cores in the node). 3GB Ram 120GB Raid 10 HDD space 5TB B/W 8 IP's CentOS 5 X86 minimal Cpanel 11.30.6 Fantastico Softaculous Premium * RVSkins * WHMCS * * Starred items are scripts that I own licences for, and are not using licences provided by WiredTree Benchmark results:
Posted by tianpu, 03-08-2012, 03:31 AM
steadfast: x3450 4gb ram 2*500g hdd with hw raid1
Posted by shahrul, 03-09-2012, 02:19 AM
BuyVM 512 Package. ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
Posted by bwrob, 03-09-2012, 02:01 PM
Dedi server at http://stealthyhosting.com p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; } BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: server.dns2000.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-274.18.1.el5 -- #1 SMP Thu Feb 9 12:45:44 EST 2012 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (5000.1 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.2 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.4 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (4999.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 07:54:37 up 1 day, 20:55, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 09 2012 07:54:37 - 08:22:49 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13867911.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2874.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2410.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 449060.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 122638.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 759515.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 836997.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 82400.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12594.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5883.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2670.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 805576.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13867911.7 1188.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2874.4 522.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 2410.6 560.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 449060.7 1134.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 122638.7 741.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 759515.2 1309.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 836997.6 672.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 82400.1 206.0 Process Creation 126.0 12594.7 999.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5883.4 387.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2670.8 4451.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 805576.6 537.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 865.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 09 2012 08:22:49 - 08:51:05 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 110117372.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 22965.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 20053.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 149470.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 39435.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 374281.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 6540961.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2145171.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 65968.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 30755.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4403.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1803097.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 110117372.5 9435.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 22965.6 4175.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 20053.5 4663.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 149470.2 377.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39435.1 238.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 374281.3 645.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6540961.3 5258.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2145171.6 5362.9 Process Creation 126.0 65968.2 5235.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 30755.5 7253.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4403.1 7338.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1803097.1 1202.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2611.8 p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
Posted by StealthyHosting, 03-09-2012, 03:02 PM
Not too bad
Posted by forumtalk, 03-10-2012, 07:03 PM
Storm SSD 3GB
Posted by ivytony, 03-15-2012, 02:46 PM
here is my benchmark results on my VPS at Serveraxis. Specs: 0.5GB Memory 1.0GB Swap 14GB SSD Storage. The results look pretty poor to me
Posted by tnedator, 04-03-2012, 12:04 PM
Do I have to make any modifications to get an accurate reading on a single proc, Intel Xeon E31230 with 8 gig of RAM and an SSD Raid 1? Either to the ./Run command or to the config file before making/running it? Thanks
Posted by tnedator, 04-03-2012, 01:43 PM
I ran Unixbench with no adjustments or paramaters. New HiVelocity Sandy Bridge Xeon E3-1230 3.2 Ghz. 8 GB Ram. 2 x 180GB Intel 520 SSD's in Raid 1.
Posted by mastens, 04-05-2012, 06:24 PM
Hetzner EX4
Posted by eva2000, 04-10-2012, 06:38 AM
New E3-1270, 16GB DDR3, 2x1TB raid 1 from databasebydesignllc.com i7z stats
Posted by dewaforex, 04-21-2012, 08:18 PM
wizzvps 160MB RAM
Posted by theslimshady, 04-27-2012, 02:09 PM
both freebsd 9.0 - smp 4 - 3gb ram, qemu-kvm Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2012 18:47:00 - 19:15:34 unknown CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 13079599.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2682.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2393.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 30316.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 30371.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 28848.3 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1319979.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 334284.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5312.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3362.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1370.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 765102.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 13079599.0 1120.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2682.0 487.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 2393.3 556.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 30316.0 76.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 30371.6 183.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 28848.3 49.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1319979.9 1061.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 334284.2 835.7 Process Creation 126.0 5312.4 421.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3362.0 792.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1370.0 2283.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 765102.6 510.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 452.3 with virtio below Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2012 19:35:12 - 20:03:41 unknown CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12901826.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2601.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2305.8 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 123788.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 51136.9 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 84399.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1320641.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 336231.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6620.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4335.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1677.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 769687.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12901826.3 1105.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2601.7 473.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 2305.8 536.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 123788.6 312.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 51136.9 309.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 84399.6 145.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1320641.1 1061.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 336231.6 840.6 Process Creation 126.0 6620.1 525.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4335.4 1022.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1677.9 2796.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 769687.5 513.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 611.1
Posted by RACKSET, 04-28-2012, 09:59 AM
WebNX E5-1650 6/12 cores @3.2ghz 64GB ram, 4x 1TB 7.2k rpm w/ raid 10 LSI 8888 dd / hdparam
Posted by DYSW, 04-28-2012, 12:20 PM
VPS test from http://www.sonwebhost.com. Attention: these guys are using pentium 4 from 2004 for their nodes. Seriously.
Posted by DaFrog, 05-04-2012, 04:43 PM
Just wanted to compare an HyperV powered node to all those Xen/OpenVZ ones out there and thought i would share the result with the thread. BareBone(Supermicro 2x XeonE5620 48GB RAM(44GB Commited to Guests)) Windows 2008 R2 HyperV VPS on node running 11 Other Guests: 4 Cores 1GB Ram 10GB HDD fixed on LSI hardware controller 512MB Cache in RAID5 Nightly Live VHD backup Debian 64Bit running 3.3 kernel couse of the HyperV Kernel drivers in it. ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 ./Run dd/hdparm middle result of 3 runs.
Posted by emostoyanov, 05-07-2012, 06:51 AM
Here are the readings for the Hetzner new EX10, 1x Intel® Core i7-3930K Hexacore, 64Gb DDR3, 4x3TB RAID10, Ubuntu Server 12.04: Last edited by emostoyanov; 05-07-2012 at 06:56 AM. Reason: Add code tags
Posted by DMEHosting, 05-10-2012, 01:24 PM
E5-1650 CPU 128GB Memory
Posted by dreamnetua, 05-15-2012, 05:36 AM
New dedicated server Ivy Bridge Core i5-3450 3.1 (3.5 Turbo) 4Gb Ram 2xHDD 750 Gb Sata3
Posted by kafloofen, 05-26-2012, 05:40 PM
Bitcable KVM VPS Zetta Plan 2048 MB RAM Corgitech VMWare VPS - 1.5GB RAM
Posted by George_Fusioned, 06-02-2012, 11:18 AM
Hetzner EX 4 server Intel® Core i7-2600 Quadcore RAM 16 GB DDR3 RAM Hard disks 2 x 3 TB SATA 6 Gb/s HDD 7200 rpm (Software-RAID 1)
Posted by devonblzx, 07-17-2012, 12:28 PM
50TBcloud.com Level 5 / VirtuallyDedicated Application Level 5
Posted by serverbear, 07-18-2012, 09:39 PM
Secured Servers Dual E5506 4 x 500GB Hardware RAID10 IO Benchmark
Posted by twva, 07-27-2012, 05:08 PM
OVH Quebec Beta RAM 16 GB HDD 946 GB CPU Model Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2130 CPU @ 3.40GHz CPU Cores 4 CPU Speed 3400 MHz CPU Cache 3072 KB ServerBear benchmark results: UnixBench score: 4008.1 I/O rate: 90.9 MB/second Bandwidth rate: 7.7 MB/second
Posted by Fishclip, 08-17-2012, 04:35 AM
Kimsufi 2G (Celeron 220) running Debian 6.0.5 (stable) and 3.2.0 kernel:
Posted by Fishclip, 08-18-2012, 04:34 AM
Same Kimsufi 2G (Celeron 220) but running OVH's stock Debian 6.0.5 x86_64:
Posted by Fishclip, 08-22-2012, 11:37 PM
Kimsufi 2G (Atom N2800) running Debian Wheezy x86_64:
Posted by tnibecker, 09-02-2012, 10:08 AM
Secured Server E3 - 1230 8GB ram
Posted by Cbchung, 10-01-2012, 03:08 AM
E5-2420 32GB RAM SAS E3-1230 32GB RAM Sata
Posted by serverbear, 10-07-2012, 09:04 PM
DataShack Dual Intel Xeon 5462 8GB RAM 120GB SSD Full Report: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2012...HEVWXUAKwf4USF
Posted by RossHIS, 10-07-2012, 10:18 PM
Intel® Core i7-920 Quadcore RAM 24 GB DDR3 RAM HDD 2 TB IO Benchmark:
Posted by Turix, 10-08-2012, 11:53 AM
Kimsufi 2G (Dec 2011) - Intel Atom N230 (1.60 GHz) Sequential Write: Sequential Read: I also had the following lying around which makes a nice comparison piece. Gumstix Overo FireSTORM - ARM Cortex-A8 (800MHz)
Posted by NE-Andy, 10-24-2012, 06:13 AM
Here's the results from my "New" server. Dell PE 2950 Gen III, PERC 6/i, 2xE5450, 32GB (8x4GB) RAM, 5x 146GB 15K RPM SAS Drive on RAID 6. Just created the new virtual drive in the configuration settings, did full initialization, and installed OS. On software end, fresh install of Debian 6 Squeeze, SSH server and core system utilities, then apt-get install the necessary packages to compile and run unixbench. Looks like comparing to my old results, the 8 parallel tasks test did not perform as well as my older system. I will need to look into the results in more details to figure out what dragged the score down.
Posted by djs596, 10-24-2012, 08:44 AM
You did the file copy speed test this time but not before.
Posted by IA64, 10-31-2012, 02:18 AM
root@ia64 [~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync 16384+0 records in 16384+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.30166 seconds, 467 MB/s Result way above expectation ? ( Intel SSD 320 120GB ) Btw I'm getting /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libGL.so when searching for -lGL when I try to make. Last edited by IA64; 10-31-2012 at 02:25 AM.
Posted by klamas, 11-02-2012, 05:17 AM
blackhost.ru VPS-SSD-1 Romania 3,4 GHz CPU 1024 MB RAM 20 GB SSD Virtualization KVM Last edited by klamas; 11-02-2012 at 05:26 AM.
Posted by klamas, 11-02-2012, 05:32 AM
blackhost.ru HP i7-2600 QuadCore 8 х 3,4 Ггц CPU (HT) 8 GB DDR3-1333 RAM 2 x 3 TB SATA3 HDD 1 IP address 1 Gbps
Posted by mojojuju, 11-03-2012, 03:20 PM
OneProvider.com - OpenVZ VPS - OneCloud-vCL-04 6GB RAM 6 cores
Posted by mojojuju, 11-03-2012, 03:48 PM
BTW, the above OneProvider.com benchmark was done on a server from their Chicago location (Ubiquity). Last edited by mojojuju; 11-03-2012 at 03:55 PM.
Posted by SWH-Ritchie, 11-14-2012, 06:43 PM
2 x L5420 Quad Core, 16 GB RAM, 2 x 1 TB SATA 7200 RPM at RAID 1
Posted by BitronicTech-Bryan, 11-15-2012, 01:22 AM
Strange unixbench on xen pv Centos 6.3 DomU CentOS 5.8 Dom0... I am running a Xen PV on a Quad-Core 3.3GHz E3-1230-V2 Xeon Ivy Bridge, 8GB RAM, 2 X 1TB SAS with 8 threads. One thread is pinned to Dom0. I had setup a VPS with 1024MB RAM and 50GB HD. Capped at 100% of one core but not pinned, with 4vCPUs. DomU is running CentOS 6.3, Dom0 uses virtualizor as the frontend panel. When I ran benchmarks I got some... interesting results: I/O Seek Test (No Cache) DD FIO What is the cause of this madness? Any ideas?
Posted by CSCenter, 11-20-2012, 04:26 PM
GBServers GBS-1024 1GB Memory 55GB HDD Intel Xeon E5607 CPU Centos 5.8 with CPanel 2 IP's 100MBit Connection Softaculous RVSkins Installatron
Posted by PersonalJ, 11-28-2012, 07:30 PM
ChicagoVPS Buffalo 2GB Enterprise VPS
Posted by tianpu, 12-01-2012, 06:34 PM
Hivelocity E3-1270 16GB Ram 240GB Intel 520 SSD 1TB Sata III
Posted by leovpn, 12-12-2012, 10:26 AM
can you tell me that is it better than VPN ?
Posted by AdamD, 01-16-2013, 04:29 PM
From Icebluehost.com (Germany DC) Total processors: 8 Vendor GenuineIntel Name Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz Speed 1600.000 MHz Cache 8192 KB 8Gb Ram Running Cpanel/WHM
Posted by klamas, 01-16-2013, 04:37 PM
It is reseller of Hetzner?
Posted by webcams, 01-21-2013, 07:33 PM
Ubiquity Hosting - Los Angeles 2 GB Ram VPS out of Los Angeles Data Center
Posted by TravisT-[SSS], 01-23-2013, 09:19 AM
Just brought up a new server =) Now the fun of compiling GRSec+PaX
Posted by zvs-, 01-24-2013, 05:37 PM
./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: Nogleg: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.2.0-36-generic -- #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8 21:44:52 UTC 2013 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6823.6 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (6822.9 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 14:40:09 up 5 days, 10:58, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.39, 0.41; runlevel 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 24 2013 14:40:09 - 15:04:28 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43783357.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4072.2 MWIPS (11.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4549.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2796540.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 244355.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 17645.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14495.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 3245.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5826.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4932775.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43783357.3 3751.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4072.2 740.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 4549.3 1058.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2796540.2 2248.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 244355.1 610.9 Process Creation 126.0 17645.7 1400.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14495.0 3418.6 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 3245.8 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5826.7 9711.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4932775.9 3288.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 2041.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 24 2013 15:04:28 - 15:28:33 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 169401471.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 30984.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 31084.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 12067919.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2037081.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 88694.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 54634.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 3605.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7200.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 10296170.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 169401471.5 14516.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 30984.9 5633.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 31084.5 7228.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12067919.1 9700.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2037081.5 5092.7 Process Creation 126.0 88694.8 7039.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 54634.4 12885.5 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 3605.4 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7200.1 12000.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 10296170.9 6864.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 8443.9
Posted by Desiguru, 02-06-2013, 02:58 AM

Posted by Zevus, 02-06-2013, 08:41 PM
with settings dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 This is a Xeon E3-1270 v2, 32GB ECC RAM. This is probably a few percentage points less than it would have been eventually (didn't get around to doing some optimizations), but the benchmarks as delivered in any case. System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39926343.0 3421.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4663.2 847.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 4392.8 1021.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2555693.0 2054.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 226967.9 567.4 Process Creation 126.0 18170.3 1442.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14479.9 3415.1 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 3260.8 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5850.2 9750.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4642018.5 3094.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 2000.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 29 2013 07:53:26 - 08:17:26 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 179925640.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 33010.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 31119.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 11826911.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 2010190.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 91326.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 54995.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 3637.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7266.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 10174835.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 179925640.0 15417.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 33010.5 6001.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 31119.2 7237.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 11826911.3 9507.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2010190.7 5025.5 Process Creation 126.0 91326.9 7248.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 54995.5 12970.6 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 3637.1 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7266.8 12111.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 10174835.2 6783.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 8561.4
Posted by FuNKyMIkE, 02-15-2013, 10:20 AM
EG 64G Hybrid (SSD + SATA3) @ OVH, France E5-1620
Posted by Fapvps, 02-21-2013, 03:29 PM
Dual Xeon L5520 36GB DDR3@1066Mhz Triple Channel Adaptec 3405 + BBU RAID 10 with 4 Seagate SAS 7200
Posted by digdugdog, 03-05-2013, 05:10 PM
HELP... This seems really slow! Any ideas what's wrong? Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz 8Gb ram centos 5.9 64bit Last edited by digdugdog; 03-05-2013 at 05:19 PM. Reason: added os
Posted by TravisT-[SSS], 03-13-2013, 03:12 AM
New VPS node. 74GB RAM 16 cores RAID 10 SATA I'll need to run this again, the numbers seem way too low. I've had lesser boxes pull higher numbers. DISK TESTS: Last edited by TravisT-[SSS]; 03-13-2013 at 03:18 AM.
Posted by pjkenned, 04-14-2013, 10:23 PM
Anyone ever have an issue with UnixBench where it does not work in multi-threaded mode? This is what I'm seeing with dual Intel Xeon E5-2430L CPUs: Then it just ends without giving multi-CPU results.
Posted by eva2000, 04-15-2013, 12:36 AM
need unixbench 5.1.3 and patch fix for >16 cores https://code.google.com/p/byte-unixb...es/detail?id=4
Posted by pjkenned, 04-15-2013, 05:25 PM
Hi - just wanted to say thank you for this tip!
Posted by eva2000, 04-15-2013, 10:45 PM
You're welcome, found the problem when i tried to benchmark my home server = dual Xeon E5-2650
Posted by pjkenned, 04-16-2013, 12:51 AM
Ha! Yea I have a bunch of dual Xeon 6-8 core servers I need to test. Building a Linux benchmark suite for STH. Right now I have six servers at home (and just put online another 5 tonight) and also doing the EC2 comparison. This was very frustrating to see the Atom S1260 able to do UnixBench while the Supermicro Hyper-Speed Xeon E5-2687W system couldn't :-) Thanks again (and if you have an idea for a siege script feel free to let me know.)
Posted by eva2000, 04-16-2013, 02:10 AM
ooh interesting benchmarks something up my alley seeing as my Centmin Mod project for nginx auto installer bundles Siege benchmark with it Latest tests with my custom siege benchmark scripts http://centminmod.com/siegebenchmark...313/index.html Will pop on by your forums
Posted by shinji257, 04-27-2013, 11:14 AM
Linode 1GB VPS after their recent upgrades. Intel E5-2670 CPU w/ 8 cores. Note: There was alot of CPU steal being noted during the test likely due to prioritization and higher plans can use more CPU so it is possible that higher plans will yield higher scores.
Posted by Fishclip, 06-18-2013, 10:47 PM
Dedicated Dell R210 II, 1x Xeon E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz, 8 Gigs DDR3 RAM. Running Debian 7, hosted at online.net (France).
Posted by RA4W, 06-27-2013, 06:11 PM
VPS http://innovationhosting.org CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5520 @ 2.27GHz (4533.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 21:14:08 up 5:00, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.31, 0.13; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 27 2013 21:14:08 - 21:42:02 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21551463.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 1653.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2154.7 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 591114.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 160346.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1406360.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1332959.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 193298.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6247.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2958.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 849.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1478985.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21551463.5 1846.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1653.9 300.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 2154.7 501.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 591114.5 1492.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 160346.0 968.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1406360.5 2424.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1332959.2 1071.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 193298.0 483.2 Process Creation 126.0 6247.1 495.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2958.1 697.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 849.2 1415.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1478985.2 986.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 889.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 27 2013 21:42:02 - 22:09:57 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42848291.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3298.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6536.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 681708.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 192195.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1764606.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2619971.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 409234.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 11348.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5556.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1010.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2505293.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42848291.0 3671.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3298.5 599.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 6536.4 1520.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 681708.3 1721.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 192195.5 1161.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1764606.6 3042.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2619971.0 2106.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 409234.6 1023.1 Process Creation 126.0 11348.6 900.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5556.5 1310.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1010.1 1683.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2505293.5 1670.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1514.5
Posted by Xtended, 07-03-2013, 09:13 AM
- DUAL E5-2690 - 128GB DDR3 ECC - 8 x 240GB Intel SSD 520 Series, RAID 10 LSI 2208 @ 6Gbps
Posted by aww, 07-06-2013, 04:14 AM
OVH MG "Reloaded" July 2013 disk benchmarks disabled (will run later) ./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16 disk benchmarks are useless because of massive cache: hdparm -tT /dev/sda Last edited by aww; 07-06-2013 at 04:21 AM.
Posted by aww, 07-06-2013, 07:28 AM
Ran a second time with 5.1.3 and hyperthreading disabled Let the disk benchmarks run too. Last test apparently the raid was in verify mode, which it now finished. OVH MG "reloaded" July 2013 Much better disk reads on hdparm because raid verify was no longer running
Posted by XDF4u, 07-16-2013, 06:33 PM
Hetzner Dedicated Server EX40-SSD Intel® Core i7-4770 Quadcore Haswell incl. Hyper-Threading Technology RAM 32 GB DDR3 RAM Hard Drives 2 x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD (Software-RAID 1) Connection 1 Gbit/s-Port Guaranteed Bandwidth 200 Mbit/s Backup Space 100 GB Inclusive Traffic 20 TB http://www.hetzner.de/ Debian 7.0 64 bit Tests run 2013-07-16 full test custom test excluding disk disk write 64k blocks without caching disk read without caching
Posted by olivpulseheberg, 07-31-2013, 09:29 AM
Core i7 3820 (3.6GHz) + 2x 128GB OCZ Vertex 4
Posted by sandydpd, 08-10-2013, 01:38 PM
Anyone get the following error when running make?
Posted by FIAHOST, 09-15-2013, 04:48 PM
Experimental virtual server with 4 Gb of RAM and one single disk. Testing Write: Testing Read:
Posted by xorion, 09-23-2013, 11:39 PM
is this bad?
Posted by gtv6, 10-01-2013, 11:56 AM
KS 24G (sep '13) Xeon W3520 @ 2.67GHz 24Gb ram 1 x 2Tb SATA drive
Posted by gtv6, 10-01-2013, 12:03 PM
Xeon E5504 @ 2.00GHz 24Gb ram 2 x 2Tb SATA in Raid 1 does anyone have any data on how much server load affects the results?
Posted by olivpulseheberg, 10-12-2013, 08:06 AM
HP DL160 Gen8 2x Xeon E5-2640 64GB DDR3 ECC memory 3x 2To SAS 7.2K @ Online.net
Posted by Thomas_iKoula, 10-18-2013, 10:24 AM
VPS - Ikoula's Flex'2 (2CPU, 1Go RAM, 80Go HDD)
Posted by ahmandonk, 10-21-2013, 11:30 PM
HP DL360e G8 - Xeon E5-2420 2x Xeon E5-2420 [12 Cores (2x6)] 32 GB DDR3-RAM ECC 2x 2,000 GB SATA II HDDs 7.200 rpm"
Posted by tianpu, 10-25-2013, 05:36 AM
Limestonenetworks.com E3-1270 v2 16G ram Samsung 840 128G SSD x4 raid10
Posted by tomerr, 11-01-2013, 08:22 AM
oneprovider.com Intel Core i3-530 2.93 GHz 4GB 2x 1Tb HW RAID
Posted by RRWH, 12-04-2013, 04:54 AM
Well, It looks like my new Home Dev server means that the Atom processor is finally All grown up! The Brand new Atom C2758 2.4G / 8 Core / 16G RAM (Yep, I can still add another 16 if I need to! Only got it a couple of days ago, and just had to see how it went. http://www.supermicro.com/products/m...1SRi-2758F.cfm Anyway, on to the Results - Very impressed all things considered! Results that are quite impressive given that this is an Atom!
Posted by MassNodes, 12-24-2013, 05:53 AM
Dual Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz, 4x3TB Raid 10 w/ Megaraid 512MB Cache - OpenVZ Test Intel i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz, 120GB SSD, 4x4TB RAID 10 - OpenVZ Test
Posted by tinoandrijic, 12-24-2013, 10:25 AM
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz 2x3TB Raid 1, 32 GB RAM
Posted by skyeg, 02-06-2014, 01:59 AM
have like yours bud
Posted by BitSin, 03-02-2014, 03:08 PM

Posted by AAOK, 03-25-2014, 12:59 AM
X3440 16GB ram at FutureHosting
Posted by aww, 04-10-2014, 06:29 PM
OVH SoYouStart BK-24T six drives in RAID 6 six drives in RAID 1
Posted by shinji257, 04-19-2014, 04:48 PM
Did a benchmark on a Linode 2G after the recent SSD migration.
Posted by pjkenned, 04-27-2014, 02:39 PM
Not sure if this helps anyone, but I have these and a few other common benchmarks scripted that I used for STH using UnixBench 5.1.3 + the patch for too many cores (I think it was >16 right?) The script takes a clean Ubuntu server installation (have tested from 12.04 -> 14.04) then: Installs all updates, Compiles/ installs everything, Runs hardinfo, UnixBench CPU tests in the OP, some PTS tests and a c-ray benchmark Not suitable for a production server so this is for testing only since you are updating and running as sudo. The plus side is three steps: Feel free to audit the code before trying as it is just a bash script. That may help folks trying to do quick tests and that are having trouble figuring out what to get in terms of dependencies. What may also help is this is the same script we use for the main site so quite a bit of data also for easy comparison. Also, we are working on the STHbench 2014 version at: https://github.com/STH-Dev/STHbench.sh/ That has a bunch of new benchmarks added but also works in CentOS and a bunch of others with a Docker branch already working. The 2014 version does all of the above also and one of the next steps is being able to selectively just run the tests one wants (e.g. UnixBench). Also, we need to work on tidying up after so it will eventually remove everything automatically. Hope that helps folks who are having trouble getting this working.
Posted by aww, 05-02-2014, 06:58 PM
OVH SoYouStart SYS-E32-1 Intel Xeon E3 1225v2 3.2 GHz+ 32 GB ECC CentOS release 6.5 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64
Posted by kisses, 05-03-2014, 05:50 PM

Posted by FredQc, 05-04-2014, 03:36 PM
OVH SoYouStart SYS-E32-3 HW Raid-1 Intel Xeon E3 1245v2 3.4 GHz+ 32 GB CentOS release 6.5 64Bits
Posted by FredQc, 05-21-2014, 12:48 AM
OVH HOST-32 SSD Upgrade 2x160GB SoftRaid AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4334 3.1 GHz 32 GB RAM CentOS release 6.5 64Bits+cPanel TOTAL PRICE $165.56 CAD / Mo Yes, this is slow... SYS-E32-3 floored it completely! For the asked price this server not worth it... Disappointed here!
Posted by FredQc, 05-27-2014, 05:49 PM
Kimsufi KS-3 Intel Core i3 3.4 GHz+ 8Gb RAM CentOS 6.5 64 Bits $20 / Mo Real good for the price, I was not expecting that. 15 ($20 USD) per month is a decent price for a decent server (Ok, no support whatsoever at Kimsufi, but who cares...?)
Posted by Dedi4me, 05-29-2014, 02:50 PM
Dual Octo-Core E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz Sandy Bridge Xeon --------------------------------------------------------- 2 x 2.6GHz Octo-Core E5-2650 Sandy Bridge Xeon 32GB DDR3 2 x 160GB / SSD (Intel DC S3500) RAID 1 CentOS 64bit release 6.5 Last edited by Dedi4me; 05-29-2014 at 03:04 PM.
Posted by Dedi4me, 05-29-2014, 03:06 PM
[Dual CPU] Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz PassMark 19,808
Posted by FredQc, 06-06-2014, 05:42 PM
Not really dedicated, but here it his... AcclaimedHost U:2048 w/ DOUBLE RAM PROMO - 4096 MB VPS [$10/Mo] Very happy!
Posted by paulg1981, 06-11-2014, 09:27 PM
NFOServers 6-Core VDS 6GB RAM
Posted by paulg1981, 06-11-2014, 09:30 PM
Exelion E3-1230v3 16GB RAM, 2x2TB Raid1
Posted by FiberFy, 07-07-2014, 10:31 PM
Kimsufi KS-3 Intel Core i3 3.4 GHz, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD CentOS 6.5 64 Bits 20 Eur per month It's pretty good actually!
Posted by patchwork, 07-28-2014, 01:29 PM
Dual Intel Xeon 5650 24GB DDR3 Ram
Posted by keith007, 08-01-2014, 04:19 PM
Server - Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2 - 16GB Memory - Adaptec 6405E RAID Controller - 2x 500GB 7200rpm Hard Disk - RAID 1 - CentOS 6 x64
Posted by kisses, 08-01-2014, 05:28 PM
dual xeon L5420
Posted by exoexo, 08-23-2014, 06:33 AM
Just tested my new VPS from hudsonvalleyhost: cPanel/Managed 6GB RAM, 250GB HDD, purchased with 2 CPU cores. With promo code cost me $41,25/month. Works perfect for me. VPS was alreasy serving all websites and server load wa high when test run. I missed chance to test it while new and not setup all websites.
Posted by exoexo, 09-16-2014, 04:16 PM
One more test now with other VPS tmzVPS, VM-10G plan, OpenVZ, 8 CPU cores (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz), 10 GB RAM
Posted by xlightwaverx, 09-19-2014, 12:25 AM
I might as well join the party... Incendia Web Works Shared, VPS, and Dedicated Hosting Solutions!
Posted by BACKUP SPIDER, 10-05-2014, 02:21 AM
System Benchmarks Index Score 2515.5 Quite good for Vultr $5 Cloud SSD VPS with 768MB memory.
Posted by DYSW, 10-06-2014, 09:58 AM
1 core vps on a 1240v3 cpu. privately run in virtualbox. 14.04 with kernel 3.17.
Posted by XDF4u, 01-19-2015, 09:57 PM
Hetzner VX 18 VPS: Dual Core, 4 GB RAM, 100 GB HD, 6 TB traffic/mo. Tests run on Debian 7.7 64 bit. Last edited by XDF4u; 01-19-2015 at 10:00 PM. Reason: Cut some headers that took space.
Posted by unsalkorkmaz, 01-20-2015, 12:48 PM
Hetzner EX40 - Intel® Core i7-4770 - 32 GB DDR3 RAM - 2 x 2 TB SATA 6 Gb/s 7200 rpm - Centos 6.6 directly command result:
Posted by unsalkorkmaz, 01-20-2015, 01:41 PM
Hetzner EX40 - Intel® Core™ i7-4770 - 32 GB DDR3 RAM - 2 x 2 TB SATA 6 Gb/s 7200 rpm - Centos 6.6 command result:
Posted by gonggo, 01-31-2015, 01:47 AM
cheap old dual L5420 8GB ram
Posted by Ghan_04, 02-19-2015, 10:12 AM
New Xeon E5 2630 v3 @ 2.40 Ghz
Posted by eva2000, 05-03-2015, 12:55 PM
Intel Xeon D-1540 2.0ghz 8 + 8 = 16 cpu threads
Posted by nomnom, 05-20-2015, 05:01 AM
Hetzner Intel Xeon E3-1245 32 GB DDR3 RAM - 2 x 3TB SATA 6 Gb/s 7200 (Seagate Constellation ES) on RAID 0 - LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i - Debian 7.8 Last edited by nomnom; 05-20-2015 at 05:07 AM.
Posted by nomnom, 05-20-2015, 05:03 AM
Hetzner Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2 - 32 GB DDR3 RAM - 2 x 3TB SATA 6 Gb/s 7200 (Seagate Constellation ES) on RAID 0 - Debian 7.8 Last edited by nomnom; 05-20-2015 at 05:07 AM.
Posted by shinji257, 05-20-2015, 11:34 AM
Got a Kimsufi KS-3 server today. Results from unix-bench with disk i/o tests completed. The server actually has a 2TB drive inside vs the advertised 1TB spec.
Posted by Mateuss, 08-02-2015, 05:27 AM
VPS Server Premium X8 SSD Server4you. Server use only for testing.
Posted by Mateuss, 08-02-2015, 08:31 AM
Hetzner Root Server EX4 Intel i7-2600.
Posted by shinji257, 10-20-2015, 09:18 PM
SoYouStart E3-SAT-3 server
Posted by BACKUP SPIDER, 10-22-2015, 10:23 PM
Hetzner ODROID-XU4 AX10 Samsung Exynos-5422 Octa-Core / 2 GB LPDDR3 / 32 GB MicroSD We are not using this for anything, I was just interested in to see the result of benchmark test. This is not worth money priced at 11.78 euros/month.
Posted by thebennyboy, 02-09-2016, 06:59 PM
Servdiscount.com - AMD Opteron 3365, 16GB RAM, 2x 1TB Software RAID1
Posted by thebennyboy, 02-09-2016, 10:22 PM
i3d.net - Intel Xeon X3430, 16GB ECC RAM, 2x 250GB Software RAID1 and 25TB @ 1Gbps
Posted by itsyndicateorg, 03-24-2016, 10:14 AM
worldstream.nl E-1270v2
Posted by zigstum, 05-06-2016, 09:52 AM
nfoservers.com QuadCore VPS, 8GB RAM.
Posted by zigstum, 05-18-2016, 06:41 AM

Posted by FredQc, 01-19-2017, 07:40 PM
OVH SP-128 E5-1650v4 2 x450Go NVMe 128 GB DDR4 ECC 2400MHz Beauharnois, Qc Location I think UnixBench is somewhat outdated now...
Posted by eva2000, 01-19-2017, 08:49 PM
OVH MC-32 I7 4790K 32GB 2x240GB SSD
Posted by NightMan, 03-03-2017, 12:04 AM
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: server.arivoo.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Thu Jul 23 15:44:03 UTC 2015 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 8: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 9: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 10: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 12: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 13: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 14: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 15: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 16: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 17: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.7 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 18: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 19: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 20: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 21: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 22: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization CPU 23: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (4799.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization 05:55:22 up 44 min, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.08, 0.02; runlevel Mar ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 03 2017 05:55:22 - 06:23:32 24 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38334541.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4589.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1980.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1065423.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 278935.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2437355.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2065952.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 94606.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4433.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3777.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2188.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2930829.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38334541.2 3284.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4589.4 834.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 1980.1 460.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1065423.7 2690.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 278935.2 1685.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2437355.1 4202.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2065952.0 1660.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 94606.2 236.5 Process Creation 126.0 4433.2 351.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3777.5 890.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2188.4 3647.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2930829.4 1953.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1289.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 03 2017 06:23:32 - 06:51:51 24 CPUs in system; running 24 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 450641314.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 77795.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 65944.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 328295.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 84333.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 958243.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 22331297.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 5231488.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 133784.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 97448.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 13448.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4138931.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 450641314.0 38615.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 77795.0 14144.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 65944.4 15335.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 328295.2 829.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 84333.0 509.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 958243.5 1652.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 22331297.8 17951.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 5231488.8 13078.7 Process Creation 126.0 133784.5 10617.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 97448.6 22983.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 13448.8 22414.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4138931.0 2759.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 7239.2
Posted by FredQc, 04-11-2017, 02:51 PM
OVH GAME MC-64 i7-6700K 64GB RAM 2x480GB SSD
Posted by FredQc, 04-18-2017, 03:43 PM
OVH SP-64 2017 E3-1270v6 64GB DDR4 2400 2x450GB NVMe
Posted by jpphd, 04-25-2017, 09:07 PM
i7-4770 32GB RAM 120GB SSD Not bad at all. Actually, it performed better than the i7-4790k above...
Posted by hakabe, 04-28-2017, 04:36 AM
Download link is obsolete. Also people should comment out graphic tests in the Makefile for it to be able to compile without X-libraries and such (as I don't want them on my servers)
Posted by FredQc, 06-11-2017, 06:25 PM
SoYouStart E5v2-SAT-2-32 E5-1650v2 32GB RAM 2x3TB SATA
Posted by eva2000, 06-11-2017, 08:35 PM
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2620v4 64GB 4x1TB SSD raid 10
Posted by GameHostOnline, 06-14-2017, 05:18 AM
404 link is dead
Posted by eva2000, 06-14-2017, 05:48 AM
use UnixBench 5.1.3 https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench/releases
Posted by GameHostOnline, 06-14-2017, 06:09 AM
Could you explain me how to download the file on my dedicated servers?
Posted by LusoAloja, 07-20-2017, 09:20 AM
You can do by
Posted by FredQc, 10-23-2017, 11:20 PM
Hetzner EX41 - Intel Core i7-7700 - 32GB 2133 DDR4 - 2 x 4TB - Centos 7.4 Not bad for 39EUR, but some older i7 outperform this one...
Posted by AndyB78, 04-09-2018, 06:34 AM
I open up with a question: why would Unix Bench simply exit on more than 16 concurrent threads? I can see others that successfully ran it on 32 threads. I have a dual E5-2640 v3 SuperMicro server with 96GB RAM and HW RAID-10 made up of 4 Samsung 960GB PM SSDs with SolusVM KVM and if I try to run it for all it's 32 threads, UnixBench simply exits. See below in red. Please note that I've tried this both from the node and from one node-wide VPS (with all 32 cores allocated to it). Anyway, this is the result from the NODE with 16 threads (limited to a max of 2 test runs, i.e. "-i 2"). Even though it tests with only one CPU this seems somewhat low to me. And now from a VPS with 16 vCPUs and 64GB RAM allocated to it: